Which has the lower trailing P/E, CSL or HL?

CSL has the lower trailing P/E: CSL trades at 18.93 and HL at 35.10. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, CSL or HL?

Over the past five years, HL grew revenue faster — CSL at a 3.75% CAGR versus HL at 14.42%.

Does CSL or HL pay a bigger dividend?

CSL yields 1.40% and HL yields 0.09% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is CSL or HL more profitable?

HL runs the higher net margin — CSL at 14.21% versus HL at 20.83%.

How have CSL and HL total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, CSL delivered 13.62% and HL delivered 11.99% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Carlisle Companies Incorporated (CSL) vs Hecla Mining Company (HL)

A side-by-side comparison of Carlisle Companies Incorporated and Hecla Mining Company across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 2, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

CSL

Carlisle Companies Incorporated

$13.33B

$329.34Basic MaterialsDelayed quote: Oct 2, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Hecla Mining Company

$11.54B

$17.20Basic MaterialsDelayed quote: Oct 2, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — CSL vs HL

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

CSL +254.1% (+13.5%/yr)HL +245.7% (+13.2%/yr)CSL compounded faster over this window

CSL HL

CSL vs HL: by the numbers

•CSL is the larger company ($13.33B vs $11.54B market cap).
•CSL trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (18.93 vs 35.10 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•HL converts more revenue to profit (20.83% vs 14.21% net margin).
•HL grew revenue faster over the past five years (14.42% vs 3.75% CAGR).
•CSL pays the higher dividend yield (1.40% vs 0.09%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	CSL	HL
P/E ratio	18.93	35.10
Forward P/E	15.69	23.64
PEG ratio	0.78	N/A
P/S ratio	2.61	7.20
P/B ratio	8.24	4.31
EV / EBITDA	12.79	12.17
FCF yield	6.50%	4.47%

Profitability

Metric	CSL	HL
Gross margin	35.26%	43.72%
Operating margin	19.97%	37.71%
Net margin	14.21%	20.83%
ROE	44.80%	12.47%
ROIC	14.71%	18.37%

Dividends

Metric	CSL	HL
Dividend yield	1.40%	0.09%
Payout ratio	26.15%	3.06%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	CSL	HL
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	3.75%	14.42%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	24.18%	N/A
FCF CAGR (5Y)	10.16%	28.20%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	11.26%	25.79%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, CSL or HL?: CSL has the lower trailing P/E: CSL trades at 18.93 and HL at 35.10. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, CSL or HL?: Over the past five years, HL grew revenue faster — CSL at a 3.75% CAGR versus HL at 14.42%.
Does CSL or HL pay a bigger dividend?: CSL yields 1.40% and HL yields 0.09% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is CSL or HL more profitable?: HL runs the higher net margin — CSL at 14.21% versus HL at 20.83%.
How have CSL and HL total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, CSL delivered 13.62% and HL delivered 11.99% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full CSL analysis Full HL analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Carlisle Companies P/E ratio Hecla Mining P/E ratio Carlisle Companies dividend yield Hecla Mining dividend yield Carlisle Companies ROE Hecla Mining ROE Carlisle Companies operating margin Hecla Mining operating margin Carlisle Companies revenue growth Hecla Mining revenue growth Carlisle Companies free cash flow Hecla Mining free cash flow

Carlisle Companies & Hecla Mining appear in these rankings

25+ Year Dividend Growers Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Highest Operating Margin Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 2, 2026.