CoStar Group, Inc. (CSGP) vs Kimco Realty Corporation (KIM)
A side-by-side comparison of CoStar Group, Inc. and Kimco Realty Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of August 20, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
Total return — CSGP vs KIM
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10yCSGP vs KIM: by the numbers
- •KIM is the larger company ($16.41B vs $13.67B market cap).
- •KIM converts more revenue to profit (27.73% vs 2.08% net margin).
- •KIM grew revenue faster over the past five years (14.73% vs 14.49% CAGR).
- •KIM pays a dividend (4.24% yield), while CSGP has no payments in the available dividend history.
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | CSGP | KIM |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 183.71 | 27.33 |
| Forward P/E | N/A | 29.34 |
| P/S ratio | 3.84 | 7.48 |
| P/B ratio | 1.72 | 1.59 |
| EV / EBITDA | 34.11 | 17.41 |
| FCF yield | 2.29% | 5.24% |
For REITs like CoStar Group, Inc., GAAP P/E is distorted: heavy non-cash property depreciation depresses reported earnings and overstates the multiple. Real-estate companies are valued on funds from operations (FFO / AFFO) and price-to-FFO — see the Funds From Operations section. The P/E is shown for reference only.
For REITs like Kimco Realty Corporation, GAAP P/E is distorted: heavy non-cash property depreciation depresses reported earnings and overstates the multiple. Real-estate companies are valued on funds from operations (FFO / AFFO) and price-to-FFO — see the Funds From Operations section. The P/E is shown for reference only.
Profitability
| Metric | CSGP | KIM |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 76.48% | 54.85% |
| Operating margin | 2.18% | 35.80% |
| Net margin | 2.08% | 27.73% |
| ROE | 0.93% | 5.91% |
| ROIC | 0.60% | 3.95% |
Dividends
| Metric | CSGP | KIM |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | N/A | 4.24% |
| Payout ratio | N/A | 124.10% |
CoStar Group, Inc.'s payout ratio is measured against GAAP earnings, which non-cash depreciation depresses for REITs — the dividend is conventionally assessed against funds from operations (FFO / AFFO) instead, so the GAAP figure overstates the payout burden.
Kimco Realty Corporation's payout ratio is measured against GAAP earnings, which non-cash depreciation depresses for REITs — the dividend is conventionally assessed against funds from operations (FFO / AFFO) instead, so the GAAP figure overstates the payout burden.
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CSGP | KIM |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 14.49% | 14.73% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -51.09% | -18.16% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | -5.28% | 5.82% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -16.31% | 7.50% |
Frequently asked
- Which has grown faster, CSGP or KIM?
- Over the past five years, KIM grew revenue faster — CSGP at a 14.49% CAGR versus KIM at 14.73%.
- Does CSGP or KIM pay a bigger dividend?
- KIM pays a dividend (4.24% yield), while CSGP has no payments in the available dividend history.
- Is CSGP or KIM more profitable?
- KIM runs the higher net margin — CSGP at 2.08% versus KIM at 27.73%.
- How have CSGP and KIM total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, CSGP delivered 4.94% and KIM delivered 3.00% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
CoStar & Kimco Realty appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified August 20, 2026.