CoStar Group, Inc. (CSGP) vs CubeSmart (CUBE)
CUBE leads on 8 of 12 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of CoStar Group, Inc. and CubeSmart across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 24, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
Total return — CSGP vs CUBE
growth of $100 · last 22yCSGP +587.7%CUBE +142.0%CSGP compounded faster
CSGP CUBE
CSGP vs CUBE: by the numbers
- •CSGP is the larger company ($12.36B vs $9.27B market cap).
- •CUBE trades at the lower earnings multiple (28.77 vs 519.93 P/E).
- •CUBE converts more revenue to profit (28.93% vs 0.74% net margin).
- •CSGP grew revenue faster over the past five years (14.62% vs 9.95% CAGR).
- •CUBE pays a dividend (5.14% yield) while CSGP does not currently pay one.
Which is better, CSGP or CUBE?
Metric tally: CSGP 4 · CUBE 8It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueCUBE(lower P/E)
GrowthCSGP(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualityCUBE(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | CSGP | CUBE |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 519.93 | 28.77● |
| Forward P/E | — | 27.25 |
| P/S ratio | 3.67● | 8.24 |
| P/B ratio | 1.58● | 3.52 |
| PEG ratio | — | 2.52 |
| EV / EBITDA | 34.95 | 18.13● |
Profitability
| Metric | CSGP | CUBE |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 77.40%● | 11.86% |
| Operating margin | -0.76% | 39.51%● |
| Net margin | 0.74% | 28.93%● |
| ROE | 0.32% | 12.36%● |
| ROIC | -0.17% | 6.76%● |
Dividends
| Metric | CSGP | CUBE |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | — | 5.14% |
| Payout ratio | — | 143.84% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CSGP | CUBE |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 14.62%● | 9.95% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -51.09% | 11.43%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -19.42% | 1.58%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, CSGP or CUBE?
- It depends on your goal. value: CUBE (lower P/E); growth: CSGP (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: CUBE (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, CUBE leads 8 to 4.
- Is CSGP or CUBE cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, CUBE is cheaper: CSGP trades at a 519.93 P/E and CUBE at 28.77.
- Which has grown faster, CSGP or CUBE?
- Over the past five years, CSGP grew revenue faster — CSGP at a 14.62% CAGR versus CUBE at 9.95%.
- Does CSGP or CUBE pay a bigger dividend?
- CUBE pays a dividend (5.14% yield) while CSGP does not currently pay one.
- Is CSGP or CUBE more profitable?
- CUBE runs the higher net margin — CSGP at 0.74% versus CUBE at 28.93%.
- Which has been the better investment, CSGP or CUBE?
- Over the past 10-year, CUBE delivered the higher annualized total return — CSGP at 3.36% versus CUBE at 7.68%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
CoStar P/E ratioCubeSmart P/E ratioCoStar dividend yieldCubeSmart dividend yieldCoStar ROECubeSmart ROECoStar operating marginCubeSmart operating marginCoStar revenue growthCubeSmart revenue growthCoStar free cash flowCubeSmart free cash flow
CoStar & CubeSmart appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 24, 2026.