Which has the lower trailing P/E, CSCO or PLTR?

CSCO has the lower trailing P/E: CSCO trades at 37.49 and PLTR at 136.67. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, CSCO or PLTR?

Over the past five years, PLTR grew revenue faster — CSCO at a 4.58% CAGR versus PLTR at 34.11%.

Does CSCO or PLTR pay a bigger dividend?

CSCO pays a dividend (1.48% yield), while PLTR has no payments in the available dividend history.

Is CSCO or PLTR more profitable?

PLTR runs the higher net margin — CSCO at 19.69% versus PLTR at 43.67%.

How have CSCO and PLTR total returns compared?

Over the past 5 years, CSCO delivered 17.36% and PLTR delivered 40.87% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO) vs Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR)

A side-by-side comparison of Cisco Systems, Inc. and Palantir Technologies Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 30, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

CSCO

Cisco Systems, Inc.

$447.47B

$113.53TechnologyDelayed quote: Jul 30, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

PLTR

Palantir Technologies Inc.

$280.60B

$122.21TechnologyDelayed quote: Jul 30, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — CSCO vs PLTR

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 6y

CSCO +248.8%PLTR +1194.7%PLTR compounded faster

CSCO PLTR

CSCO vs PLTR: by the numbers

•CSCO is the larger company ($447.47B vs $280.60B market cap).
•CSCO trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (37.49 vs 136.67 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•PLTR converts more revenue to profit (43.67% vs 19.69% net margin).
•PLTR grew revenue faster over the past five years (34.11% vs 4.58% CAGR).
•CSCO pays a dividend (1.48% yield), while PLTR has no payments in the available dividend history.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	CSCO	PLTR
P/E ratio	37.49	136.67
Forward P/E	26.31	84.41
P/S ratio	7.38	60.53
P/B ratio	9.18	37.42
PEG ratio	68.42	1.13
EV / EBITDA	28.27	155.65
FCF yield	2.81%	0.85%

Profitability

Metric	CSCO	PLTR
Gross margin	64.33%	84.07%
Operating margin	23.36%	38.13%
Net margin	19.69%	43.67%
ROE	24.47%	27.00%
ROIC	11.66%	17.95%

Dividends

Metric	CSCO	PLTR
Dividend yield	1.48%	N/A
Payout ratio	64.84%	N/A

Growth (annualized)

Metric	CSCO	PLTR
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	4.58%	34.11%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	0.50%	N/A
FCF CAGR (5Y)	-2.45%	94.15%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	18.64%	40.87%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, CSCO or PLTR?: CSCO has the lower trailing P/E: CSCO trades at 37.49 and PLTR at 136.67. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, CSCO or PLTR?: Over the past five years, PLTR grew revenue faster — CSCO at a 4.58% CAGR versus PLTR at 34.11%.
Does CSCO or PLTR pay a bigger dividend?: CSCO pays a dividend (1.48% yield), while PLTR has no payments in the available dividend history.
Is CSCO or PLTR more profitable?: PLTR runs the higher net margin — CSCO at 19.69% versus PLTR at 43.67%.
How have CSCO and PLTR total returns compared?: Over the past 5 years, CSCO delivered 17.36% and PLTR delivered 40.87% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full CSCO analysis Full PLTR analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Cisco Systems P/E ratio Palantir Technologies P/E ratio Cisco Systems dividend yield Palantir Technologies dividend yield Cisco Systems ROE Palantir Technologies ROE Cisco Systems operating margin Palantir Technologies operating margin Cisco Systems revenue growth Palantir Technologies revenue growth Cisco Systems free cash flow Palantir Technologies free cash flow

Cisco Systems & Palantir Technologies appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest Operating Margin Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 30, 2026.