Which has the lower trailing P/E, CSCO or PLTR?

CSCO has the lower trailing P/E: CSCO trades at 33.67 and PLTR at 141.72. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, CSCO or PLTR?

Over the past five years, PLTR grew revenue faster — CSCO at a 5.09% CAGR versus PLTR at 35.90%.

Does CSCO or PLTR pay a bigger dividend?

CSCO pays a dividend (1.55% yield), while PLTR has no payments in the available dividend history.

Is CSCO or PLTR more profitable?

PLTR runs the higher net margin — CSCO at 20.95% versus PLTR at 49.00%.

How have CSCO and PLTR total returns compared?

Over the past 5 years, CSCO delivered 16.38% and PLTR delivered 45.36% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO) vs Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR)

A side-by-side comparison of Cisco Systems, Inc. and Palantir Technologies Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 11, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

CSCO

Cisco Systems, Inc.

$441.95B

$112.13TechnologyDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

PLTR

Palantir Technologies Inc.

$383.97B

$167.23TechnologyDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — CSCO vs PLTR

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 6y

CSCO +229.6% (+22.0%/yr)PLTR +1684.5% (+61.7%/yr)PLTR compounded faster over this window

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

CSCO PLTR

CSCO vs PLTR: by the numbers

•CSCO is the larger company ($441.95B vs $383.97B market cap).
•CSCO trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (33.67 vs 141.72 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•PLTR converts more revenue to profit (49.00% vs 20.95% net margin).
•PLTR grew revenue faster over the past five years (35.90% vs 5.09% CAGR).
•CSCO pays a dividend (1.55% yield), while PLTR has no payments in the available dividend history.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	CSCO	PLTR
P/E ratio	33.67	141.72
Forward P/E	21.91	104.86
P/S ratio	6.98	62.37
P/B ratio	8.79	39.28
EV / EBITDA	25.93	143.52
FCF yield	2.93%	0.87%

Profitability

Metric	CSCO	PLTR
Gross margin	64.52%	84.80%
Operating margin	24.27%	31.59%
Net margin	20.95%	49.00%
ROE	26.38%	30.86%
ROIC	12.96%	25.60%

Dividends

Metric	CSCO	PLTR
Dividend yield	1.55%	N/A
Payout ratio	49.85%	N/A

Growth (annualized)

Metric	CSCO	PLTR
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	5.09%	35.90%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	6.03%	N/A
FCF CAGR (5Y)	-0.58%	122.48%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	16.38%	45.36%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, CSCO or PLTR?: CSCO has the lower trailing P/E: CSCO trades at 33.67 and PLTR at 141.72. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, CSCO or PLTR?: Over the past five years, PLTR grew revenue faster — CSCO at a 5.09% CAGR versus PLTR at 35.90%.
Does CSCO or PLTR pay a bigger dividend?: CSCO pays a dividend (1.55% yield), while PLTR has no payments in the available dividend history.
Is CSCO or PLTR more profitable?: PLTR runs the higher net margin — CSCO at 20.95% versus PLTR at 49.00%.
How have CSCO and PLTR total returns compared?: Over the past 5 years, CSCO delivered 16.38% and PLTR delivered 45.36% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full CSCO analysis Full PLTR analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Cisco Systems P/E ratio Palantir Technologies P/E ratio Cisco Systems dividend yield Cisco Systems ROE Palantir Technologies ROE Cisco Systems operating margin Palantir Technologies operating margin Cisco Systems revenue growth Palantir Technologies revenue growth Cisco Systems free cash flow Palantir Technologies free cash flow

Cisco Systems & Palantir Technologies appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Highest Operating Margin Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 11, 2026.