Which has the lower trailing P/E, CSCO or PANW?

CSCO has the lower trailing P/E: CSCO trades at 32.78 and PANW at 765.86. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, CSCO or PANW?

Over the past five years, PANW grew revenue faster — CSCO at a 5.09% CAGR versus PANW at 21.95%.

Does CSCO or PANW pay a bigger dividend?

CSCO pays a dividend (1.52% yield), while PANW has no payments in the available dividend history.

Is CSCO or PANW more profitable?

CSCO runs the higher net margin — CSCO at 20.95% versus PANW at 2.67%.

How have CSCO and PANW total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, CSCO delivered 16.66% and PANW delivered 29.97% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO) vs Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (PANW)

A side-by-side comparison of Cisco Systems, Inc. and Palo Alto Networks, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 9, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

CSCO

Cisco Systems, Inc.

$431.31B

$109.43TechnologyDelayed quote: Sep 9, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

PANW

Palo Alto Networks, Inc.

$273.11B

$335.10TechnologyDelayed quote: Sep 9, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — CSCO vs PANW

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

CSCO +365.7% (+16.6%/yr)PANW +1275.4% (+30.0%/yr)PANW compounded faster over this window

CSCO PANW

CSCO vs PANW: by the numbers

•CSCO is the larger company ($431.31B vs $273.11B market cap).
•CSCO trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (32.78 vs 765.86 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•CSCO converts more revenue to profit (20.95% vs 2.67% net margin).
•PANW grew revenue faster over the past five years (21.95% vs 5.09% CAGR).
•CSCO pays a dividend (1.52% yield), while PANW has no payments in the available dividend history.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	CSCO	PANW
P/E ratio	32.78	765.86
Forward P/E	25.53	N/A
P/S ratio	6.87	22.43
P/B ratio	8.66	9.36
EV / EBITDA	25.55	149.09
FCF yield	3.12%	1.71%

Profitability

Metric	CSCO	PANW
Gross margin	64.52%	70.36%
Operating margin	24.27%	6.05%
Net margin	20.95%	2.67%
ROE	26.38%	1.12%
ROIC	12.96%	1.03%

Dividends

Metric	CSCO	PANW
Dividend yield	1.52%	N/A
Payout ratio	49.85%	N/A

Growth (annualized)

Metric	CSCO	PANW
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	5.09%	21.95%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	6.03%	N/A
FCF CAGR (5Y)	-0.58%	25.30%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	16.44%	34.14%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, CSCO or PANW?: CSCO has the lower trailing P/E: CSCO trades at 32.78 and PANW at 765.86. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, CSCO or PANW?: Over the past five years, PANW grew revenue faster — CSCO at a 5.09% CAGR versus PANW at 21.95%.
Does CSCO or PANW pay a bigger dividend?: CSCO pays a dividend (1.52% yield), while PANW has no payments in the available dividend history.
Is CSCO or PANW more profitable?: CSCO runs the higher net margin — CSCO at 20.95% versus PANW at 2.67%.
How have CSCO and PANW total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, CSCO delivered 16.66% and PANW delivered 29.97% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full CSCO analysis Full PANW analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Cisco Systems P/E ratio Palo Alto Networks P/E ratio Cisco Systems dividend yield Cisco Systems ROE Palo Alto Networks ROE Cisco Systems operating margin Palo Alto Networks operating margin Cisco Systems revenue growth Palo Alto Networks revenue growth Cisco Systems free cash flow Palo Alto Networks free cash flow

Cisco Systems & Palo Alto Networks appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks Largest Companies by Market Cap

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 9, 2026.