Is CSCO or MU cheaper?

On trailing earnings, CSCO is cheaper: CSCO trades at a 40.37 P/E and MU at 46.32.

Which has grown faster, CSCO or MU?

Over the past five years, MU grew revenue faster — CSCO at a 4.58% CAGR versus MU at 20.34%.

Does CSCO or MU pay a bigger dividend?

CSCO yields 1.36% and MU yields 0.05% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is CSCO or MU more profitable?

MU runs the higher net margin — CSCO at 19.69% versus MU at 41.49%.

Which has been the better investment, CSCO or MU?

Over the past 10-year, MU delivered the higher annualized total return — CSCO at 18.88% versus MU at 55.52%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO) vs Micron Technology, Inc. (MU)

MU leads on 9 of 16 compared metrics, though CSCO is the cheaper stock.

A side-by-side comparison of Cisco Systems, Inc. and Micron Technology, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 13, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Micron Technology, Inc.

$1.11T

$981.61Technology

Total return — CSCO vs MU

growth of $100 · last 30y

CSCO +1850.1%MU +6387.8%MU compounded faster

CSCO MU

CSCO vs MU: by the numbers

•MU is the larger company ($1.11T vs $477.31B market cap).
•CSCO trades at the lower earnings multiple (40.37 vs 46.32 P/E).
•MU converts more revenue to profit (41.49% vs 19.69% net margin).
•MU grew revenue faster over the past five years (20.34% vs 4.58% CAGR).
•CSCO pays the higher dividend yield (1.36% vs 0.05%).

Which is better, CSCO or MU?

Metric tally: CSCO 7 · MU 9

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueCSCO(lower P/E)

GrowthMU(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

IncomeCSCO(higher dividend yield)

QualityMU(higher ROIC)

Valuation

Metric	CSCO	MU
P/E ratio	40.37●	46.32
Forward P/E	28.33	—
P/S ratio	7.95●	19.25
P/B ratio	9.88●	15.44
PEG ratio	68.41	0.02●
EV / EBITDA	29.07●	30.08
FCF yield	2.61%●	0.92%

Profitability

Metric	CSCO	MU
Gross margin	64.33%●	58.44%
Operating margin	23.36%	48.52%●
Net margin	19.69%	41.49%●
ROE	24.47%	33.28%●
ROIC	11.66%	12.12%●

Dividends

Metric	CSCO	MU
Dividend yield	1.36%●	0.05%
Payout ratio	64.45%	6.47%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	CSCO	MU
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	4.58%	20.34%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	-0.69%	5.12%●
FCF CAGR (5Y)	-2.45%	140.90%●
Total return CAGR (5Y)	20.60%	66.18%●

Frequently asked

Which is better, CSCO or MU?: It depends on your goal. value: CSCO (lower P/E); growth: MU (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: CSCO (higher dividend yield); quality: MU (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, MU leads 9 to 7.
Is CSCO or MU cheaper?: On trailing earnings, CSCO is cheaper: CSCO trades at a 40.37 P/E and MU at 46.32.
Which has grown faster, CSCO or MU?: Over the past five years, MU grew revenue faster — CSCO at a 4.58% CAGR versus MU at 20.34%.
Does CSCO or MU pay a bigger dividend?: CSCO yields 1.36% and MU yields 0.05% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is CSCO or MU more profitable?: MU runs the higher net margin — CSCO at 19.69% versus MU at 41.49%.
Which has been the better investment, CSCO or MU?: Over the past 10-year, MU delivered the higher annualized total return — CSCO at 18.88% versus MU at 55.52%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full CSCO analysis Full MU analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Cisco Systems P/E ratio Micron Technology P/E ratio Cisco Systems dividend yield Micron Technology dividend yield Cisco Systems ROE Micron Technology ROE Cisco Systems operating margin Micron Technology operating margin Cisco Systems revenue growth Micron Technology revenue growth Cisco Systems free cash flow Micron Technology free cash flow

Cisco Systems & Micron Technology appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest Operating Margin Stocks Best 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 13, 2026.