CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (CRWD) vs International Business Machines Corporation (IBM)
IBM leads on 9 of 13 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. and International Business Machines Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 14, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
CRWD
CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.
$208.48Technology
IBM
International Business Machines Corporation
$218.66Technology
Total return — CRWD vs IBM
growth of $100 · last 7yCRWD +1195.9%IBM +125.1%CRWD compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
CRWD IBM
CRWD vs IBM: by the numbers
- •CRWD is the larger company ($212.29B vs $205.52B market cap).
- •IBM is profitable (15.61% net margin) while CRWD runs a net loss (-0.48%).
- •CRWD grew revenue faster over the past five years (38.52% vs -0.09% CAGR).
- •IBM pays a dividend (2.33% yield) while CRWD does not currently pay one.
Which is better, CRWD or IBM?
Metric tally: CRWD 4 · IBM 9It depends on what you're optimizing for:
GrowthCRWD(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualityIBM(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | CRWD | IBM |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | — | 25.66 |
| Forward P/E | 202.40 | 23.32● |
| P/S ratio | 38.05 | 4.01● |
| P/B ratio | 41.83 | 8.38● |
| PEG ratio | — | 0.35 |
| EV / EBITDA | 1791.98 | 20.46● |
| FCF yield | 0.75% | 4.74%● |
Profitability
| Metric | CRWD | IBM |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 75.03%● | 58.97% |
| Operating margin | -3.91% | 16.36%● |
| Net margin | -0.48% | 15.61%● |
| ROE | -0.53% | 32.61%● |
| ROIC | -4.24% | 8.57%● |
Dividends
| Metric | CRWD | IBM |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | — | 2.33% |
| Payout ratio | — | 59.51% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CRWD | IBM |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 38.52%● | -0.09% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | — | 12.59% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 35.07%● | -3.35% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 23.55%● | 14.54% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, CRWD or IBM?
- It depends on your goal. growth: CRWD (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: IBM (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, IBM leads 9 to 4.
- Which has grown faster, CRWD or IBM?
- Over the past five years, CRWD grew revenue faster — CRWD at a 38.52% CAGR versus IBM at -0.09%.
- Does CRWD or IBM pay a bigger dividend?
- IBM pays a dividend (2.33% yield) while CRWD does not currently pay one.
- Is CRWD or IBM more profitable?
- IBM runs the higher net margin — CRWD at -0.48% versus IBM at 15.61%.
- Which has been the better investment, CRWD or IBM?
- Over the past 5-year, CRWD delivered the higher annualized total return — CRWD at 23.55% versus IBM at 7.95%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
CrowdStrike P/E ratioInternational Business Machines P/E ratioCrowdStrike dividend yieldInternational Business Machines dividend yieldCrowdStrike ROEInternational Business Machines ROECrowdStrike operating marginInternational Business Machines operating marginCrowdStrike revenue growthInternational Business Machines revenue growthCrowdStrike free cash flowInternational Business Machines free cash flow
CrowdStrike & International Business Machines appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 14, 2026.