Which has the lower trailing P/E, CRUS or EPAM?

CRUS has the lower trailing P/E: CRUS trades at 14.26 and EPAM at 15.52. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, CRUS or EPAM?

Over the past five years, EPAM grew revenue faster — CRUS at a 7.86% CAGR versus EPAM at 13.08%.

Is CRUS or EPAM more profitable?

CRUS runs the higher net margin — CRUS at 21.00% versus EPAM at 7.15%.

How have CRUS and EPAM total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, CRUS delivered 9.17% and EPAM delivered 5.34% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Cirrus Logic, Inc. (CRUS) vs EPAM Systems, Inc. (EPAM)

A side-by-side comparison of Cirrus Logic, Inc. and EPAM Systems, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 11, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

CRUS

Cirrus Logic, Inc.

$5.88B

$116.48TechnologyDelayed quote: Sep 10, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

EPAM

EPAM Systems, Inc.

$5.98B

$114.52TechnologyDelayed quote: Sep 10, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — CRUS vs EPAM

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

CRUS +126.0% (+8.5%/yr)EPAM +70.5% (+5.5%/yr)CRUS compounded faster over this window

CRUS EPAM

CRUS vs EPAM: by the numbers

•EPAM is the larger company ($5.98B vs $5.88B market cap).
•CRUS trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (14.26 vs 15.52 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•CRUS converts more revenue to profit (21.00% vs 7.15% net margin).
•EPAM grew revenue faster over the past five years (13.08% vs 7.86% CAGR).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	CRUS	EPAM
P/E ratio	14.26	15.52
Forward P/E	13.82	8.71
P/S ratio	2.87	1.07
P/B ratio	2.68	1.70
EV / EBITDA	9.98	7.50
FCF yield	9.74%	8.07%

Profitability

Metric	CRUS	EPAM
Gross margin	52.78%	28.33%
Operating margin	23.05%	10.26%
Net margin	21.00%	7.15%
ROE	19.67%	11.42%
ROIC	16.69%	11.07%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	CRUS	EPAM
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	7.86%	13.08%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	16.75%	2.86%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	14.36%	6.36%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	6.11%	-28.83%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, CRUS or EPAM?: CRUS has the lower trailing P/E: CRUS trades at 14.26 and EPAM at 15.52. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, CRUS or EPAM?: Over the past five years, EPAM grew revenue faster — CRUS at a 7.86% CAGR versus EPAM at 13.08%.
Is CRUS or EPAM more profitable?: CRUS runs the higher net margin — CRUS at 21.00% versus EPAM at 7.15%.
How have CRUS and EPAM total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, CRUS delivered 9.17% and EPAM delivered 5.34% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full CRUS analysis Full EPAM analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Cirrus Logic P/E ratio EPAM Systems P/E ratio Cirrus Logic ROE EPAM Systems ROE Cirrus Logic operating margin EPAM Systems operating margin Cirrus Logic revenue growth EPAM Systems revenue growth Cirrus Logic free cash flow EPAM Systems free cash flow

Cirrus Logic & EPAM Systems appear in these rankings

Highest FCF Yield Stocks Lowest P/E Ratio Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 11, 2026.