Which has the lower trailing P/E, CRTO or QNST?

CRTO has the lower trailing P/E: CRTO trades at 7.42 and QNST at 10.60. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, CRTO or QNST?

Over the past five years, QNST grew revenue faster — CRTO at a -3.48% CAGR versus QNST at 17.47%.

Is CRTO or QNST more profitable?

QNST runs the higher net margin — CRTO at 5.60% versus QNST at 6.28%.

How have CRTO and QNST total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, CRTO delivered -8.60% and QNST delivered 17.38% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Criteo S.A. (CRTO) vs QuinStreet, Inc. (QNST)

A side-by-side comparison of Criteo S.A. and QuinStreet, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

CRTO

Criteo S.A.

$735M

$14.62Communication ServicesDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 1:20 PM EDT

QNST

QuinStreet, Inc.

$851M

$14.81Communication ServicesDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 1:15 PM EDT

Total return — CRTO vs QNST

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

CRTO -59.5% (-8.6%/yr)QNST +399.7% (+17.5%/yr)QNST compounded faster over this window

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

CRTO QNST

CRTO vs QNST: by the numbers

•QNST is the larger company ($851M vs $735M market cap).
•CRTO trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (7.42 vs 10.60 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•QNST converts more revenue to profit (6.28% vs 5.60% net margin).
•QNST grew revenue faster over the past five years (17.47% vs -3.48% CAGR).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	CRTO	QNST
P/E ratio	7.42	10.60
Forward P/E	4.19	9.31
PEG ratio	0.42	0.40
P/S ratio	0.39	0.66
P/B ratio	0.65	2.63
EV / EBITDA	2.34	13.62
FCF yield	24.15%	14.49%

Profitability

Metric	CRTO	QNST
Gross margin	53.60%	11.27%
Operating margin	8.02%	2.74%
Net margin	5.60%	6.28%
ROE	9.26%	25.14%
ROIC	7.82%	7.68%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	CRTO	QNST
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	-3.48%	17.47%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	18.07%	26.41%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	3.38%	21.64%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-16.36%	-3.02%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, CRTO or QNST?: CRTO has the lower trailing P/E: CRTO trades at 7.42 and QNST at 10.60. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, CRTO or QNST?: Over the past five years, QNST grew revenue faster — CRTO at a -3.48% CAGR versus QNST at 17.47%.
Is CRTO or QNST more profitable?: QNST runs the higher net margin — CRTO at 5.60% versus QNST at 6.28%.
How have CRTO and QNST total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, CRTO delivered -8.60% and QNST delivered 17.38% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full CRTO analysis Full QNST analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Criteo P/E ratio QuinStreet P/E ratio Criteo ROE QuinStreet ROE Criteo operating margin QuinStreet operating margin Criteo revenue growth QuinStreet revenue growth Criteo free cash flow QuinStreet free cash flow

Criteo & QuinStreet appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.