Carpenter Technology Corporation (CRS) vs Ulta Beauty, Inc. (ULTA)
A side-by-side comparison of Carpenter Technology Corporation and Ulta Beauty, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 11, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
Different business models: CRS is classified in Basic Materials; ULTA is classified in Consumer Cyclical. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.
CRS
Carpenter Technology Corporation
$443.19Basic MaterialsDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
ULTA
Ulta Beauty, Inc.
$546.78Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — CRS vs ULTA
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10yCRS +1327.3% (+30.5%/yr)ULTA +123.5% (+8.4%/yr)CRS compounded faster over this window
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
CRS ULTA
CRS vs ULTA: by the numbers
- •ULTA is the larger company ($23.51B vs $22.02B market cap).
- •ULTA trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (19.90 vs 42.13 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •CRS converts more revenue to profit (16.96% vs 9.34% net margin).
- •CRS grew revenue faster over the past five years (16.19% vs 11.09% CAGR).
- •CRS pays a dividend (0.18% yield), while ULTA is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | CRS | ULTA |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 42.13 | 19.90 |
| Forward P/E | 33.23 | 18.86 |
| P/S ratio | 7.05 | 1.81 |
| P/B ratio | 9.89 | 8.89 |
| EV / EBITDA | 26.28 | 13.28 |
| FCF yield | 1.65% | 4.54% |
Profitability
| Metric | CRS | ULTA |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 30.58% | 39.32% |
| Operating margin | 22.47% | 12.56% |
| Net margin | 16.96% | 9.34% |
| ROE | 23.78% | 45.77% |
| ROIC | 17.08% | 23.11% |
Dividends
| Metric | CRS | ULTA |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.18% | N/A |
| Payout ratio | 7.60% | N/A |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CRS | ULTA |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 16.19% | 11.09% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 178.15% | 52.46% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 19.37% | 0.06% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 71.94% | 7.24% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, CRS or ULTA?
- ULTA has the lower trailing P/E: CRS trades at 42.13 and ULTA at 19.90. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, CRS or ULTA?
- Over the past five years, CRS grew revenue faster — CRS at a 16.19% CAGR versus ULTA at 11.09%.
- Does CRS or ULTA pay a bigger dividend?
- CRS pays a dividend (0.18% yield), while ULTA is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.
- Is CRS or ULTA more profitable?
- CRS runs the higher net margin — CRS at 16.96% versus ULTA at 9.34%.
- How have CRS and ULTA total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, CRS delivered 30.92% and ULTA delivered 8.54% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Carpenter Technology P/E ratioUlta Beauty P/E ratioCarpenter Technology dividend yieldCarpenter Technology ROEUlta Beauty ROECarpenter Technology operating marginUlta Beauty operating marginCarpenter Technology revenue growthUlta Beauty revenue growthCarpenter Technology free cash flowUlta Beauty free cash flow
Carpenter Technology & Ulta Beauty appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 11, 2026.