Carpenter Technology Corporation (CRS) vs United Airlines Holdings, Inc. (UAL)
UAL leads on 9 of 15 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Carpenter Technology Corporation and United Airlines Holdings, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 17, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
CRS
Carpenter Technology Corporation
$575.47Industrials
UAL
United Airlines Holdings, Inc.
$115.83Industrials
Total return — CRS vs UAL
growth of $100 · last 20yCRS +1230.6%UAL +266.9%CRS compounded faster
CRS UAL
CRS vs UAL: by the numbers
- •UAL is the larger company ($38.77B vs $28.59B market cap).
- •UAL trades at the lower earnings multiple (10.34 vs 60.58 P/E).
- •CRS converts more revenue to profit (15.82% vs 6.06% net margin).
- •UAL grew revenue faster over the past five years (41.67% vs 15.23% CAGR).
- •CRS pays a dividend (0.14% yield) while UAL does not currently pay one.
Which is better, CRS or UAL?
Metric tally: CRS 6 · UAL 9It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueUAL(lower P/E)
GrowthUAL(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualityCRS(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | CRS | UAL |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 60.58 | 10.34● |
| Forward P/E | 45.72 | 8.04● |
| P/S ratio | 9.56 | 0.63● |
| P/B ratio | 14.00 | 2.38● |
| PEG ratio | 0.37● | 1.66 |
| EV / EBITDA | 37.58 | 7.01● |
| FCF yield | 1.41% | 8.47%● |
Profitability
| Metric | CRS | UAL |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 29.73% | 64.24%● |
| Operating margin | 21.34%● | 8.44% |
| Net margin | 15.82%● | 6.06% |
| ROE | 23.17% | 23.09% |
| ROIC | 13.94%● | 6.63% |
Dividends
| Metric | CRS | UAL |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.14% | — |
| Payout ratio | 10.68% | — |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CRS | UAL |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 15.23% | 41.67%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 218.42%● | -2.15% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 14.57% | 61.78%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 72.91%● | 16.84% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, CRS or UAL?
- It depends on your goal. value: UAL (lower P/E); growth: UAL (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: CRS (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, UAL leads 9 to 6.
- Is CRS or UAL cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, UAL is cheaper: CRS trades at a 60.58 P/E and UAL at 10.34.
- Which has grown faster, CRS or UAL?
- Over the past five years, UAL grew revenue faster — CRS at a 15.23% CAGR versus UAL at 41.67%.
- Does CRS or UAL pay a bigger dividend?
- CRS pays a dividend (0.14% yield) while UAL does not currently pay one.
- Is CRS or UAL more profitable?
- CRS runs the higher net margin — CRS at 15.82% versus UAL at 6.06%.
- Which has been the better investment, CRS or UAL?
- Over the past 10-year, CRS delivered the higher annualized total return — CRS at 34.92% versus UAL at 10.87%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Carpenter Technology P/E ratioUnited Airlines P/E ratioCarpenter Technology dividend yieldUnited Airlines dividend yieldCarpenter Technology ROEUnited Airlines ROECarpenter Technology operating marginUnited Airlines operating marginCarpenter Technology revenue growthUnited Airlines revenue growthCarpenter Technology free cash flowUnited Airlines free cash flow
Carpenter Technology & United Airlines appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 17, 2026.