Carpenter Technology Corporation (CRS) vs Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. (SQM)
A side-by-side comparison of Carpenter Technology Corporation and Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of August 31, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
CRS
Carpenter Technology Corporation
$476.42Basic MaterialsDelayed quote: Aug 31, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
SQM
Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A.
$79.01Basic MaterialsAt close: Aug 31, 2026, 4:00 PM ET
Total return — CRS vs SQM
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10yCRS +1363.1% (+30.8%/yr)SQM +345.3% (+16.1%/yr)CRS compounded faster over this window
CRS SQM
CRS vs SQM: by the numbers
- •CRS is the larger company ($23.67B vs $22.57B market cap).
- •SQM trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (16.26 vs 45.29 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •SQM converts more revenue to profit (20.61% vs 16.96% net margin).
- •SQM grew revenue faster over the past five years (26.46% vs 16.19% CAGR).
- •SQM pays the higher dividend yield (1.29% vs 0.17%).
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | CRS | SQM |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 45.29 | 16.26 |
| Forward P/E | 45.00 | 11.59 |
| P/S ratio | 7.69 | 3.35 |
| P/B ratio | 10.78 | 3.59 |
| EV / EBITDA | 28.63 | 8.29 |
| FCF yield | 1.51% | 8.62% |
Profitability
| Metric | CRS | SQM |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 30.58% | 29.32% |
| Operating margin | 22.47% | 24.83% |
| Net margin | 16.96% | 20.61% |
| ROE | 23.78% | 22.09% |
| ROIC | 17.08% | 11.60% |
Dividends
| Metric | CRS | SQM |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.17% | 1.29% |
| Payout ratio | 7.55% | 49.42% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CRS | SQM |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 16.19% | 26.46% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 178.15% | 27.15% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 19.37% | 27.23% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 72.20% | 13.19% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, CRS or SQM?
- SQM has the lower trailing P/E: CRS trades at 45.29 and SQM at 16.26. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, CRS or SQM?
- Over the past five years, SQM grew revenue faster — CRS at a 16.19% CAGR versus SQM at 26.46%.
- Does CRS or SQM pay a bigger dividend?
- CRS yields 0.17% and SQM yields 1.29% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is CRS or SQM more profitable?
- SQM runs the higher net margin — CRS at 16.96% versus SQM at 20.61%.
- How have CRS and SQM total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, CRS delivered 31.49% and SQM delivered 16.44% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Carpenter Technology P/E ratioSociedad Química y Minera de Chile P/E ratioCarpenter Technology dividend yieldSociedad Química y Minera de Chile dividend yieldCarpenter Technology ROESociedad Química y Minera de Chile ROECarpenter Technology operating marginSociedad Química y Minera de Chile operating marginCarpenter Technology revenue growthSociedad Química y Minera de Chile revenue growthCarpenter Technology free cash flowSociedad Química y Minera de Chile free cash flow
Carpenter Technology & Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified August 31, 2026.