Which has the lower trailing P/E, CRS or RS?

RS has the lower trailing P/E: CRS trades at 61.08 and RS at 23.52. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, CRS or RS?

Over the past five years, CRS grew revenue faster — CRS at a 15.23% CAGR versus RS at 8.57%.

Does CRS or RS pay a bigger dividend?

CRS yields 0.14% and RS yields 1.21% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is CRS or RS more profitable?

CRS runs the higher net margin — CRS at 15.82% versus RS at 5.66%.

How have CRS and RS total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, CRS delivered 33.06% and RS delivered 20.35% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Carpenter Technology Corporation (CRS) vs Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. (RS)

A side-by-side comparison of Carpenter Technology Corporation and Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 28, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

CRS

Carpenter Technology Corporation

$27.85B

$560.43Basic MaterialsDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co.

$21.15B

$414.33Basic MaterialsDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — CRS vs RS

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 30y

CRS +6908.3%RS +7909.1%RS compounded faster

CRS RS

CRS vs RS: by the numbers

•CRS is the larger company ($27.85B vs $21.15B market cap).
•RS trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (23.52 vs 61.08 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•CRS converts more revenue to profit (15.82% vs 5.66% net margin).
•CRS grew revenue faster over the past five years (15.23% vs 8.57% CAGR).
•RS pays the higher dividend yield (1.21% vs 0.14%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	CRS	RS
P/E ratio	61.08	23.52
Forward P/E	54.81	18.53
P/S ratio	9.64	1.32
P/B ratio	14.12	2.82
PEG ratio	0.37	1.20
EV / EBITDA	37.42	14.86
FCF yield	1.40%	2.91%

Profitability

Metric	CRS	RS
Gross margin	29.73%	26.79%
Operating margin	21.34%	7.88%
Net margin	15.82%	5.66%
ROE	23.17%	12.09%
ROIC	13.94%	8.16%

Dividends

Metric	CRS	RS
Dividend yield	0.14%	1.21%
Payout ratio	10.68%	34.83%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	CRS	RS
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	15.23%	8.57%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	218.42%	19.64%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	14.57%	-9.42%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	74.76%	23.38%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, CRS or RS?: RS has the lower trailing P/E: CRS trades at 61.08 and RS at 23.52. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, CRS or RS?: Over the past five years, CRS grew revenue faster — CRS at a 15.23% CAGR versus RS at 8.57%.
Does CRS or RS pay a bigger dividend?: CRS yields 0.14% and RS yields 1.21% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is CRS or RS more profitable?: CRS runs the higher net margin — CRS at 15.82% versus RS at 5.66%.
How have CRS and RS total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, CRS delivered 33.06% and RS delivered 20.35% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full CRS analysis Full RS analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Carpenter Technology P/E ratio Reliance Steel & Aluminum P/E ratio Carpenter Technology dividend yield Reliance Steel & Aluminum dividend yield Carpenter Technology ROE Reliance Steel & Aluminum ROE Carpenter Technology operating margin Reliance Steel & Aluminum operating margin Carpenter Technology revenue growth Reliance Steel & Aluminum revenue growth Carpenter Technology free cash flow Reliance Steel & Aluminum free cash flow

Carpenter Technology & Reliance Steel & Aluminum appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 28, 2026.