Carpenter Technology Corporation (CRS) vs International Flavors & Fragrances Inc. (IFF)
A side-by-side comparison of Carpenter Technology Corporation and International Flavors & Fragrances Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 13, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
CRS
Carpenter Technology Corporation
$415.32Basic MaterialsDelayed quote: Sep 15, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
IFF
International Flavors & Fragrances Inc.
$84.24Basic MaterialsDelayed quote: Sep 15, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — CRS vs IFF
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10yCRS +1305.5% (+30.3%/yr)IFF -22.8% (-2.6%/yr)CRS compounded faster over this window
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
CRS IFF
CRS vs IFF: by the numbers
- •IFF is the larger company ($21.51B vs $20.64B market cap).
- •CRS trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (39.48 vs 78.00 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •CRS converts more revenue to profit (16.96% vs 2.91% net margin).
- •CRS grew revenue faster over the past five years (16.19% vs 4.28% CAGR).
- •IFF pays the higher dividend yield (1.91% vs 0.18%).
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | CRS | IFF |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 39.48 | 78.00 |
| Forward P/E | 31.14 | 24.47 |
| P/S ratio | 6.61 | 2.16 |
| P/B ratio | 9.26 | 1.54 |
| EV / EBITDA | 24.65 | 15.77 |
| FCF yield | 1.76% | 2.49% |
Profitability
| Metric | CRS | IFF |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 30.58% | 37.52% |
| Operating margin | 22.47% | 7.78% |
| Net margin | 16.96% | 2.91% |
| ROE | 23.78% | 2.07% |
| ROIC | 17.08% | 2.80% |
Dividends
| Metric | CRS | IFF |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.18% | 1.91% |
| Payout ratio | 7.60% | 148.15% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CRS | IFF |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 16.19% | 4.28% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 178.15% | -25.13% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 19.37% | -10.39% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 71.50% | -8.32% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, CRS or IFF?
- CRS has the lower trailing P/E: CRS trades at 39.48 and IFF at 78.00. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, CRS or IFF?
- Over the past five years, CRS grew revenue faster — CRS at a 16.19% CAGR versus IFF at 4.28%.
- Does CRS or IFF pay a bigger dividend?
- CRS yields 0.18% and IFF yields 1.91% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is CRS or IFF more profitable?
- CRS runs the higher net margin — CRS at 16.96% versus IFF at 2.91%.
- How have CRS and IFF total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, CRS delivered 30.76% and IFF delivered -2.30% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Carpenter Technology P/E ratioInternational Flavors & Fragrances P/E ratioCarpenter Technology dividend yieldInternational Flavors & Fragrances dividend yieldCarpenter Technology ROEInternational Flavors & Fragrances ROECarpenter Technology operating marginInternational Flavors & Fragrances operating marginCarpenter Technology revenue growthInternational Flavors & Fragrances revenue growthCarpenter Technology free cash flowInternational Flavors & Fragrances free cash flow
Carpenter Technology & International Flavors & Fragrances appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 13, 2026.