Carpenter Technology Corporation (CRS) vs International Flavors & Fragrances Inc. (IFF)
A side-by-side comparison of Carpenter Technology Corporation and International Flavors & Fragrances Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of August 1, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
CRS
Carpenter Technology Corporation
$519.66Basic MaterialsAt close: Jul 31, 2026, 4:00 PM ET
IFF
International Flavors & Fragrances Inc.
$79.22Basic MaterialsAt close: Jul 31, 2026, 4:00 PM ET
Total return — CRS vs IFF
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 30yCRS +6176.5%IFF +285.9%CRS compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
CRS IFF
CRS vs IFF: by the numbers
- •CRS is the larger company ($25.82B vs $20.23B market cap).
- •IFF trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (24.23 vs 49.40 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •CRS converts more revenue to profit (16.96% vs 7.90% net margin).
- •CRS grew revenue faster over the past five years (16.19% vs 11.71% CAGR).
- •IFF pays the higher dividend yield (2.02% vs 0.15%).
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | CRS | IFF |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 49.40 | 24.23 |
| Forward P/E | 49.09 | 18.09 |
| P/S ratio | 8.35 | 1.89 |
| P/B ratio | 11.71 | 1.44 |
| PEG ratio | 1.41 | 0.18 |
| EV / EBITDA | 32.55 | 14.33 |
| FCF yield | 1.39% | 1.96% |
Profitability
| Metric | CRS | IFF |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 30.58% | 36.35% |
| Operating margin | 22.47% | 7.56% |
| Net margin | 16.96% | 7.90% |
| ROE | 23.78% | 6.03% |
| ROIC | 17.08% | 3.19% |
Dividends
| Metric | CRS | IFF |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.15% | 2.02% |
| Payout ratio | 7.55% | N/A |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CRS | IFF |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 16.19% | 11.71% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 178.15% | -25.13% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 19.37% | -13.45% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 70.71% | -9.67% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, CRS or IFF?
- IFF has the lower trailing P/E: CRS trades at 49.40 and IFF at 24.23. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, CRS or IFF?
- Over the past five years, CRS grew revenue faster — CRS at a 16.19% CAGR versus IFF at 11.71%.
- Does CRS or IFF pay a bigger dividend?
- CRS yields 0.15% and IFF yields 2.02% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is CRS or IFF more profitable?
- CRS runs the higher net margin — CRS at 16.96% versus IFF at 7.90%.
- How have CRS and IFF total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, CRS delivered 31.64% and IFF delivered -2.72% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Carpenter Technology P/E ratioInternational Flavors & Fragrances P/E ratioCarpenter Technology dividend yieldInternational Flavors & Fragrances dividend yieldCarpenter Technology ROEInternational Flavors & Fragrances ROECarpenter Technology operating marginInternational Flavors & Fragrances operating marginCarpenter Technology revenue growthInternational Flavors & Fragrances revenue growthCarpenter Technology free cash flowInternational Flavors & Fragrances free cash flow
Carpenter Technology & International Flavors & Fragrances appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified August 1, 2026.