Carpenter Technology Corporation (CRS) vs Gilead Sciences, Inc. (GILD)
A side-by-side comparison of Carpenter Technology Corporation and Gilead Sciences, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 11, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
Different business models: CRS is classified in Basic Materials; GILD is classified in Healthcare. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.
CRS
Carpenter Technology Corporation
$443.19Basic MaterialsDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
GILD
Gilead Sciences, Inc.
$143.72HealthcareDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — CRS vs GILD
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10yCRS +1321.5% (+30.4%/yr)GILD +150.9% (+9.6%/yr)CRS compounded faster over this window
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
CRS GILD
CRS vs GILD: by the numbers
- •GILD is the larger company ($178.44B vs $22.02B market cap).
- •CRS is profitable (16.96% net margin) while GILD runs a net loss (-10.64%).
- •CRS grew revenue faster over the past five years (16.19% vs 2.72% CAGR).
- •GILD pays the higher dividend yield (2.22% vs 0.18%).
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | CRS | GILD |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 42.13 | N/A |
| Forward P/E | 33.23 | N/A |
| P/S ratio | 7.05 | 5.86 |
| P/B ratio | 9.89 | 15.09 |
| EV / EBITDA | 26.28 | N/A |
| FCF yield | 1.65% | 7.27% |
Profitability
| Metric | CRS | GILD |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 30.58% | 79.59% |
| Operating margin | 22.47% | 39.74% |
| Net margin | 16.96% | -10.64% |
| ROE | 23.78% | -27.39% |
| ROIC | 17.08% | -3.66% |
Dividends
| Metric | CRS | GILD |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.18% | 2.22% |
| Payout ratio | 7.60% | N/A |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CRS | GILD |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 16.19% | 2.72% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 178.15% | 133.83% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 19.37% | 9.27% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 71.94% | 19.60% |
Frequently asked
- Which has grown faster, CRS or GILD?
- Over the past five years, CRS grew revenue faster — CRS at a 16.19% CAGR versus GILD at 2.72%.
- Does CRS or GILD pay a bigger dividend?
- CRS yields 0.18% and GILD yields 2.22% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is CRS or GILD more profitable?
- CRS runs the higher net margin — CRS at 16.96% versus GILD at -10.64%.
- How have CRS and GILD total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, CRS delivered 30.92% and GILD delivered 10.21% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Carpenter Technology P/E ratioCarpenter Technology dividend yieldGilead Sciences dividend yieldCarpenter Technology ROEGilead Sciences ROECarpenter Technology operating marginGilead Sciences operating marginCarpenter Technology revenue growthGilead Sciences revenue growthCarpenter Technology free cash flowGilead Sciences free cash flow
Carpenter Technology & Gilead Sciences appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 11, 2026.