Carpenter Technology Corporation (CRS) vs Enerpac Tool Group Corp. (EPAC)
A side-by-side comparison of Carpenter Technology Corporation and Enerpac Tool Group Corp. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 11, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
Different business models: CRS is classified in Basic Materials; EPAC is classified in Industrials. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.
CRS
Carpenter Technology Corporation
$443.19Basic MaterialsDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
EPAC
Enerpac Tool Group Corp.
$35.22IndustrialsDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — CRS vs EPAC
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10yCRS +1321.5% (+30.4%/yr)EPAC +62.6% (+5.0%/yr)CRS compounded faster over this window
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
CRS EPAC
CRS vs EPAC: by the numbers
- •CRS is the larger company ($22.02B vs $1.82B market cap).
- •EPAC trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (19.90 vs 42.13 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •CRS converts more revenue to profit (16.96% vs 14.72% net margin).
- •CRS grew revenue faster over the past five years (16.19% vs 5.10% CAGR).
- •CRS pays the higher dividend yield (0.18% vs 0.11%).
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | CRS | EPAC |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 42.13 | 19.90 |
| Forward P/E | 33.23 | 17.10 |
| P/S ratio | 7.05 | 2.86 |
| P/B ratio | 9.89 | 4.28 |
| EV / EBITDA | 26.28 | 12.07 |
| FCF yield | 1.65% | 6.19% |
Profitability
| Metric | CRS | EPAC |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 30.58% | 49.05% |
| Operating margin | 22.47% | 21.76% |
| Net margin | 16.96% | 14.72% |
| ROE | 23.78% | 22.01% |
| ROIC | 17.08% | 15.21% |
Dividends
| Metric | CRS | EPAC |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.18% | 0.11% |
| Payout ratio | 7.60% | 2.26% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CRS | EPAC |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 16.19% | 5.10% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 178.15% | 169.53% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 19.37% | 34.85% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 71.94% | 8.14% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, CRS or EPAC?
- EPAC has the lower trailing P/E: CRS trades at 42.13 and EPAC at 19.90. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, CRS or EPAC?
- Over the past five years, CRS grew revenue faster — CRS at a 16.19% CAGR versus EPAC at 5.10%.
- Does CRS or EPAC pay a bigger dividend?
- CRS yields 0.18% and EPAC yields 0.11% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is CRS or EPAC more profitable?
- CRS runs the higher net margin — CRS at 16.96% versus EPAC at 14.72%.
- How have CRS and EPAC total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, CRS delivered 30.92% and EPAC delivered 5.00% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Carpenter Technology P/E ratioEnerpac Tool P/E ratioCarpenter Technology dividend yieldEnerpac Tool dividend yieldCarpenter Technology ROEEnerpac Tool ROECarpenter Technology operating marginEnerpac Tool operating marginCarpenter Technology revenue growthEnerpac Tool revenue growthCarpenter Technology free cash flowEnerpac Tool free cash flow
Carpenter Technology & Enerpac Tool appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 11, 2026.