Carpenter Technology Corporation (CRS) vs EMCOR Group, Inc. (EME)
EME leads on 9 of 16 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Carpenter Technology Corporation and EMCOR Group, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 17, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
CRS
Carpenter Technology Corporation
$575.47Industrials
EME
EMCOR Group, Inc.
$827.50Industrials
Total return — CRS vs EME
growth of $100 · last 30yCRS +3387.7%EME +20613.9%EME compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
CRS EME
CRS vs EME: by the numbers
- •EME is the larger company ($37.40B vs $28.59B market cap).
- •EME trades at the lower earnings multiple (27.80 vs 60.58 P/E).
- •CRS converts more revenue to profit (15.82% vs 7.52% net margin).
- •CRS grew revenue faster over the past five years (15.23% vs 15.06% CAGR).
- •EME pays the higher dividend yield (0.16% vs 0.14%).
Which is better, CRS or EME?
Metric tally: CRS 7 · EME 9It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueEME(lower P/E)
QualityEME(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | CRS | EME |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 60.58 | 27.80● |
| Forward P/E | 45.72 | 25.19● |
| P/S ratio | 9.56 | 2.10● |
| P/B ratio | 14.00 | 9.64● |
| PEG ratio | 0.37● | 0.71 |
| EV / EBITDA | 37.58 | 17.63● |
| FCF yield | 1.41% | 2.89%● |
Profitability
| Metric | CRS | EME |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 29.73%● | 19.54% |
| Operating margin | 21.34%● | 9.89% |
| Net margin | 15.82%● | 7.52% |
| ROE | 23.17% | 34.52%● |
| ROIC | 13.94% | 24.16%● |
Dividends
| Metric | CRS | EME |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.14% | 0.16%● |
| Payout ratio | 10.68% | 4.61% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CRS | EME |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 15.23% | 15.06% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 218.42%● | 63.55% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 14.57%● | 7.48% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 72.91%● | 48.60% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, CRS or EME?
- It depends on your goal. value: EME (lower P/E); quality: EME (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, EME leads 9 to 7.
- Is CRS or EME cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, EME is cheaper: CRS trades at a 60.58 P/E and EME at 27.80.
- Which has grown faster, CRS or EME?
- Over the past five years, CRS grew revenue faster — CRS at a 15.23% CAGR versus EME at 15.06%.
- Does CRS or EME pay a bigger dividend?
- CRS yields 0.14% and EME yields 0.16% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is CRS or EME more profitable?
- CRS runs the higher net margin — CRS at 15.82% versus EME at 7.52%.
- Which has been the better investment, CRS or EME?
- Over the past 10-year, CRS delivered the higher annualized total return — CRS at 34.92% versus EME at 34.05%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Carpenter Technology P/E ratioEMCOR P/E ratioCarpenter Technology dividend yieldEMCOR dividend yieldCarpenter Technology ROEEMCOR ROECarpenter Technology operating marginEMCOR operating marginCarpenter Technology revenue growthEMCOR revenue growthCarpenter Technology free cash flowEMCOR free cash flow
Carpenter Technology & EMCOR appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 17, 2026.