Carpenter Technology Corporation (CRS) vs Doximity, Inc. (DOCS)
A side-by-side comparison of Carpenter Technology Corporation and Doximity, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 11, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
Different business models: CRS is classified in Basic Materials; DOCS is classified in Healthcare. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.
CRS
Carpenter Technology Corporation
$443.19Basic MaterialsDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
DOCS
Doximity, Inc.
$25.58HealthcareDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — CRS vs DOCS
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 5yCRS +1024.7% (+62.3%/yr)DOCS -53.4% (-14.2%/yr)CRS compounded faster over this window
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
CRS DOCS
CRS vs DOCS: by the numbers
- •CRS is the larger company ($22.02B vs $4.78B market cap).
- •DOCS trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (30.09 vs 42.13 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •DOCS converts more revenue to profit (25.48% vs 16.96% net margin).
- •DOCS grew revenue faster over the past five years (21.94% vs 16.19% CAGR).
- •CRS pays a dividend (0.18% yield), while DOCS has no payments in the available dividend history.
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | CRS | DOCS |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 42.13 | 30.09 |
| Forward P/E | 33.23 | 19.01 |
| P/S ratio | 7.05 | 7.30 |
| P/B ratio | 9.89 | 5.22 |
| EV / EBITDA | 26.28 | 21.36 |
| FCF yield | 1.65% | 6.26% |
Profitability
| Metric | CRS | DOCS |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 30.58% | 88.07% |
| Operating margin | 22.47% | 29.60% |
| Net margin | 16.96% | 25.48% |
| ROE | 23.78% | 18.24% |
| ROIC | 17.08% | 15.35% |
Dividends
| Metric | CRS | DOCS |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.18% | N/A |
| Payout ratio | 7.60% | N/A |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CRS | DOCS |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 16.19% | 21.94% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 178.15% | 54.32% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 19.37% | 23.75% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 71.94% | -24.70% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, CRS or DOCS?
- DOCS has the lower trailing P/E: CRS trades at 42.13 and DOCS at 30.09. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, CRS or DOCS?
- Over the past five years, DOCS grew revenue faster — CRS at a 16.19% CAGR versus DOCS at 21.94%.
- Does CRS or DOCS pay a bigger dividend?
- CRS pays a dividend (0.18% yield), while DOCS has no payments in the available dividend history.
- Is CRS or DOCS more profitable?
- DOCS runs the higher net margin — CRS at 16.96% versus DOCS at 25.48%.
- How have CRS and DOCS total returns compared?
- Over the past 5 years, CRS delivered 71.94% and DOCS delivered -24.70% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Carpenter Technology P/E ratioDoximity P/E ratioCarpenter Technology dividend yieldCarpenter Technology ROEDoximity ROECarpenter Technology operating marginDoximity operating marginCarpenter Technology revenue growthDoximity revenue growthCarpenter Technology free cash flowDoximity free cash flow
Carpenter Technology & Doximity appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 11, 2026.