Crocs, Inc. (CROX) vs Rush Enterprises, Inc. (RUSHA)
A side-by-side comparison of Crocs, Inc. and Rush Enterprises, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
CROX
Crocs, Inc.
$120.22Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
RUSHA
Rush Enterprises, Inc.
$47.05Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — CROX vs RUSHA
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10yCROX +1293.8% (+30.1%/yr)RUSHA +673.6% (+22.7%/yr)CROX compounded faster over this window
CROX RUSHA
CROX vs RUSHA: by the numbers
- •CROX is the larger company ($5.76B vs $5.48B market cap).
- •CROX trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (10.40 vs 14.17 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •CROX converts more revenue to profit (14.63% vs 3.67% net margin).
- •CROX grew revenue faster over the past five years (16.69% vs 7.70% CAGR).
- •RUSHA pays a dividend (1.10% yield), while CROX has no payments in the available dividend history.
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | CROX | RUSHA |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 10.40 | 14.17 |
| Forward P/E | 8.62 | 19.08 |
| PEG ratio | N/A | 1.37 |
| P/S ratio | 1.42 | 0.76 |
| P/B ratio | 4.16 | 2.35 |
| EV / EBITDA | 7.90 | 12.48 |
| FCF yield | 12.22% | 2.29% |
Profitability
| Metric | CROX | RUSHA |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 57.47% | 18.98% |
| Operating margin | 20.73% | 5.13% |
| Net margin | 14.63% | 3.67% |
| ROE | 42.86% | 11.38% |
| ROIC | 18.10% | 7.17% |
Dividends
| Metric | CROX | RUSHA |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | N/A | 1.10% |
| Payout ratio | N/A | 15.66% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CROX | RUSHA |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 16.69% | 7.70% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | N/A | 19.21% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 10.38% | -22.34% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -2.90% | 19.56% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, CROX or RUSHA?
- CROX has the lower trailing P/E: CROX trades at 10.40 and RUSHA at 14.17. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, CROX or RUSHA?
- Over the past five years, CROX grew revenue faster — CROX at a 16.69% CAGR versus RUSHA at 7.70%.
- Does CROX or RUSHA pay a bigger dividend?
- RUSHA pays a dividend (1.10% yield), while CROX has no payments in the available dividend history.
- Is CROX or RUSHA more profitable?
- CROX runs the higher net margin — CROX at 14.63% versus RUSHA at 3.67%.
- How have CROX and RUSHA total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, CROX delivered 29.75% and RUSHA delivered 21.69% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Crocs P/E ratioRush Enterprises P/E ratioRush Enterprises dividend yieldCrocs ROERush Enterprises ROECrocs operating marginRush Enterprises operating marginCrocs revenue growthRush Enterprises revenue growthCrocs free cash flowRush Enterprises free cash flow
Crocs & Rush Enterprises appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.