Crocs, Inc. (CROX) vs Mohawk Industries, Inc. (MHK)
CROX leads on 8 of 14 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Crocs, Inc. and Mohawk Industries, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 24, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
CROX
Crocs, Inc.
$121.40Consumer Cyclical
MHK
Mohawk Industries, Inc.
$108.66Consumer Cyclical
Total return — CROX vs MHK
growth of $100 · last 20yCROX +767.3%MHK +32.3%CROX compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
CROX MHK
CROX vs MHK: by the numbers
- •MHK is the larger company ($6.62B vs $6.03B market cap).
- •MHK is profitable (3.77% net margin) while CROX runs a net loss (-2.58%).
- •CROX grew revenue faster over the past five years (20.80% vs 2.03% CAGR).
Which is better, CROX or MHK?
Metric tally: CROX 8 · MHK 6It depends on what you're optimizing for:
GrowthCROX(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualityMHK(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | CROX | MHK |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | — | 16.29 |
| Forward P/E | 8.88● | 12.65 |
| P/S ratio | 1.53 | 0.61● |
| P/B ratio | 4.31 | 0.80● |
| EV / EBITDA | 36.24 | 7.05● |
| FCF yield | 10.89%● | 10.58% |
Profitability
| Metric | CROX | MHK |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 58.10%● | 24.34% |
| Operating margin | 21.50%● | 4.89% |
| Net margin | -2.58% | 3.77%● |
| ROE | -7.27% | 4.95%● |
| ROIC | -27.74% | 3.54%● |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CROX | MHK |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 20.80%● | 2.03% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 56.55%● | -3.82% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 14.02%● | -12.83% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 1.42%● | -10.42% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, CROX or MHK?
- It depends on your goal. growth: CROX (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: MHK (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, CROX leads 8 to 6.
- Which has grown faster, CROX or MHK?
- Over the past five years, CROX grew revenue faster — CROX at a 20.80% CAGR versus MHK at 2.03%.
- Is CROX or MHK more profitable?
- MHK runs the higher net margin — CROX at -2.58% versus MHK at 3.77%.
- Which has been the better investment, CROX or MHK?
- Over the past 10-year, CROX delivered the higher annualized total return — CROX at 27.33% versus MHK at -5.82%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Crocs P/E ratioMohawk Industries P/E ratioCrocs dividend yieldMohawk Industries dividend yieldCrocs ROEMohawk Industries ROECrocs operating marginMohawk Industries operating marginCrocs revenue growthMohawk Industries revenue growthCrocs free cash flowMohawk Industries free cash flow
Crocs & Mohawk Industries appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 24, 2026.