Which has the lower trailing P/E, CROX or GTX?

CROX has the lower trailing P/E: CROX trades at 10.31 and GTX at 14.33. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, CROX or GTX?

Over the past five years, CROX grew revenue faster — CROX at a 16.69% CAGR versus GTX at 0.05%.

Does CROX or GTX pay a bigger dividend?

GTX pays a dividend (1.20% yield), while CROX has no payments in the available dividend history.

Is CROX or GTX more profitable?

CROX runs the higher net margin — CROX at 14.63% versus GTX at 9.51%.

How have CROX and GTX total returns compared?

Over the past 5 years, CROX delivered -2.90% and GTX delivered 29.98% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Crocs, Inc. (CROX) vs Garrett Motion Inc. (GTX)

A side-by-side comparison of Crocs, Inc. and Garrett Motion Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

CROX

Crocs, Inc.

$5.72B

$119.21Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 1:55 PM EDT

GTX

Garrett Motion Inc.

$4.89B

$26.22Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 1:55 PM EDT

Total return — CROX vs GTX

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 8y

CROX +453.8% (+23.9%/yr)GTX +43.5% (+4.6%/yr)CROX compounded faster over this window

CROX GTX

CROX vs GTX: by the numbers

•CROX is the larger company ($5.72B vs $4.89B market cap).
•CROX trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (10.31 vs 14.33 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•CROX converts more revenue to profit (14.63% vs 9.51% net margin).
•CROX grew revenue faster over the past five years (16.69% vs 0.05% CAGR).
•GTX pays a dividend (1.20% yield), while CROX has no payments in the available dividend history.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	CROX	GTX
P/E ratio	10.31	14.33
Forward P/E	8.55	13.23
PEG ratio	N/A	1.87
P/S ratio	1.41	1.30
P/B ratio	4.13	N/A
EV / EBITDA	7.85	12.25
FCF yield	12.33%	7.46%

Profitability

Metric	CROX	GTX
Gross margin	57.47%	19.47%
Operating margin	20.73%	10.63%
Net margin	14.63%	9.51%
ROE	42.86%	N/A
ROIC	18.10%	31.32%

Dividends

Metric	CROX	GTX
Dividend yield	N/A	1.20%
Payout ratio	N/A	17.49%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	CROX	GTX
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	16.69%	0.05%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	N/A	7.90%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	10.38%	N/A
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-2.90%	29.98%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, CROX or GTX?: CROX has the lower trailing P/E: CROX trades at 10.31 and GTX at 14.33. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, CROX or GTX?: Over the past five years, CROX grew revenue faster — CROX at a 16.69% CAGR versus GTX at 0.05%.
Does CROX or GTX pay a bigger dividend?: GTX pays a dividend (1.20% yield), while CROX has no payments in the available dividend history.
Is CROX or GTX more profitable?: CROX runs the higher net margin — CROX at 14.63% versus GTX at 9.51%.
How have CROX and GTX total returns compared?: Over the past 5 years, CROX delivered -2.90% and GTX delivered 29.98% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full CROX analysis Full GTX analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Crocs P/E ratio Garrett Motion P/E ratio Garrett Motion dividend yield Crocs ROE Garrett Motion ROE Crocs operating margin Garrett Motion operating margin Crocs revenue growth Garrett Motion revenue growth Crocs free cash flow Garrett Motion free cash flow

Crocs & Garrett Motion appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.