Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. (CRL) vs Universal Health Services, Inc. (UHS)
UHS leads on 12 of 14 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. and Universal Health Services, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 26, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
CRL
Charles River Laboratories International, Inc.
$212.71Healthcare
UHS
Universal Health Services, Inc.
$145.69Healthcare
Total return — CRL vs UHS
growth of $100 · last 26yCRL +861.5%UHS +770.8%CRL compounded faster
CRL UHS
CRL vs UHS: by the numbers
- •CRL is the larger company ($10.20B vs $9.12B market cap).
- •UHS is profitable (8.56% net margin) while CRL runs a net loss (-4.59%).
- •UHS grew revenue faster over the past five years (8.63% vs 5.77% CAGR).
- •UHS pays a dividend (0.55% yield) while CRL does not currently pay one.
Which is better, CRL or UHS?
Metric tally: CRL 2 · UHS 12It depends on what you're optimizing for:
GrowthUHS(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualityUHS(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | CRL | UHS |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | — | 6.11 |
| Forward P/E | 17.26 | 6.21● |
| P/S ratio | 2.59 | 0.51● |
| P/B ratio | 3.54 | 1.19● |
| PEG ratio | — | 0.26 |
| EV / EBITDA | 16.11 | 5.25● |
| FCF yield | 3.76% | 9.94%● |
Profitability
| Metric | CRL | UHS |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 31.86% | 90.45%● |
| Operating margin | 11.77%● | 11.50% |
| Net margin | -4.59% | 8.56%● |
| ROE | -6.28% | 20.19%● |
| ROIC | 8.36% | 11.29%● |
Dividends
| Metric | CRL | UHS |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | — | 0.55% |
| Payout ratio | — | 3.42% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CRL | UHS |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 5.77% | 8.63%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -40.99% | 16.19%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | -3.98%● | -4.64% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -10.47% | -0.22%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, CRL or UHS?
- It depends on your goal. growth: UHS (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: UHS (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, UHS leads 12 to 2.
- Which has grown faster, CRL or UHS?
- Over the past five years, UHS grew revenue faster — CRL at a 5.77% CAGR versus UHS at 8.63%.
- Does CRL or UHS pay a bigger dividend?
- UHS pays a dividend (0.55% yield) while CRL does not currently pay one.
- Is CRL or UHS more profitable?
- UHS runs the higher net margin — CRL at -4.59% versus UHS at 8.56%.
- Which has been the better investment, CRL or UHS?
- Over the past 10-year, CRL delivered the higher annualized total return — CRL at 10.16% versus UHS at 1.10%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Charles River Laboratories International P/E ratioUniversal Health Services P/E ratioCharles River Laboratories International dividend yieldUniversal Health Services dividend yieldCharles River Laboratories International ROEUniversal Health Services ROECharles River Laboratories International operating marginUniversal Health Services operating marginCharles River Laboratories International revenue growthUniversal Health Services revenue growthCharles River Laboratories International free cash flowUniversal Health Services free cash flow
Charles River Laboratories International & Universal Health Services appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 26, 2026.