Carter's Inc. (CRI) vs MillerKnoll, Inc. (MLKN)
A side-by-side comparison of Carter's Inc. and MillerKnoll, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
CRI
Carter's Inc.
$33.83Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
MLKN
MillerKnoll, Inc.
$20.72Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — CRI vs MLKN
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10yCRI -53.6% (-7.4%/yr)MLKN -5.7% (-0.6%/yr)MLKN compounded faster over this window
CRI MLKN
CRI vs MLKN: by the numbers
- •MLKN is the larger company ($1.41B vs $1.25B market cap).
- •CRI trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (6.16 vs 14.70 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •CRI converts more revenue to profit (6.55% vs 2.57% net margin).
- •Both shrank revenue over the past five years; MLKN's decline was smaller (-0.67% vs -2.54% CAGR).
- •MLKN pays the higher dividend yield (3.57% vs 2.96%).
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | CRI | MLKN |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 6.16 | 14.70 |
| Forward P/E | 10.34 | 10.27 |
| P/S ratio | 0.42 | 0.37 |
| P/B ratio | 1.21 | 1.04 |
| EV / EBITDA | 5.38 | 5.26 |
| FCF yield | 23.50% | 8.18% |
Profitability
| Metric | CRI | MLKN |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 48.60% | 39.57% |
| Operating margin | 9.24% | 5.51% |
| Net margin | 6.55% | 2.57% |
| ROE | 18.99% | 7.22% |
| ROIC | 10.17% | 4.77% |
Dividends
| Metric | CRI | MLKN |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 2.96% | 3.57% |
| Payout ratio | 18.21% | 53.19% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CRI | MLKN |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | -2.54% | -0.67% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -24.12% | N/A |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | -26.11% | 3.42% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -14.67% | -8.42% |
Some values include inputs from SEC filing.
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, CRI or MLKN?
- CRI has the lower trailing P/E: CRI trades at 6.16 and MLKN at 14.70. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, CRI or MLKN?
- Neither grew: over the past five years both shrank revenue, with MLKN's decline the smaller — CRI at a -2.54% CAGR versus MLKN at -0.67%.
- Does CRI or MLKN pay a bigger dividend?
- CRI yields 2.96% and MLKN yields 3.57% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is CRI or MLKN more profitable?
- CRI runs the higher net margin — CRI at 6.55% versus MLKN at 2.57%.
- How have CRI and MLKN total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, CRI delivered -6.66% and MLKN delivered -0.58% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Carter's P/E ratioMillerKnoll P/E ratioCarter's dividend yieldMillerKnoll dividend yieldCarter's ROEMillerKnoll ROECarter's operating marginMillerKnoll operating marginCarter's revenue growthMillerKnoll revenue growthCarter's free cash flowMillerKnoll free cash flow
Carter's & MillerKnoll appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.