Carter's, Inc. (CRI) vs Liquidity Services, Inc. (LQDT)
LQDT leads on 9 of 16 compared metrics, though CRI is the cheaper stock.
A side-by-side comparison of Carter's, Inc. and Liquidity Services, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 13, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
CRI
Carter's, Inc.
$42.79Consumer Cyclical
LQDT
Liquidity Services, Inc.
$37.94Consumer Cyclical
Total return — CRI vs LQDT
growth of $100 · last 20yCRI +37.1%LQDT +208.7%LQDT compounded faster
CRI LQDT
CRI vs LQDT: by the numbers
- •CRI is the larger company ($1.58B vs $1.18B market cap).
- •CRI trades at the lower earnings multiple (16.87 vs 40.80 P/E).
- •LQDT converts more revenue to profit (6.30% vs 3.07% net margin).
- •LQDT grew revenue faster over the past five years (16.76% vs -1.35% CAGR).
- •CRI pays a dividend (2.34% yield) while LQDT does not currently pay one.
Which is better, CRI or LQDT?
Metric tally: CRI 7 · LQDT 9It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueCRI(lower P/E)
GrowthLQDT(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualityLQDT(higher ROIC)
Valuation
| Metric | CRI | LQDT |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 16.87● | 40.80 |
| Forward P/E | 12.92● | 25.21 |
| P/S ratio | 0.51● | 2.55 |
| P/B ratio | 1.63● | 5.52 |
| PEG ratio | 26.78 | 0.80● |
| EV / EBITDA | 10.86● | 18.90 |
| FCF yield | 8.38%● | 6.35% |
Profitability
| Metric | CRI | LQDT |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 44.66% | 45.61%● |
| Operating margin | 4.80% | 8.37%● |
| Net margin | 3.07% | 6.30%● |
| ROE | 9.76% | 13.62%● |
| ROIC | 5.29% | 11.42%● |
Dividends
| Metric | CRI | LQDT |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 2.34% | — |
| Payout ratio | 38.61% | — |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CRI | LQDT |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | -1.35% | 16.76%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 0.63%● | -0.58% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | -24.78% | 6.73%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -13.10% | 10.63%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, CRI or LQDT?
- It depends on your goal. value: CRI (lower P/E); growth: LQDT (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: LQDT (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, LQDT leads 9 to 7.
- Is CRI or LQDT cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, CRI is cheaper: CRI trades at a 16.87 P/E and LQDT at 40.80.
- Which has grown faster, CRI or LQDT?
- Over the past five years, LQDT grew revenue faster — CRI at a -1.35% CAGR versus LQDT at 16.76%.
- Does CRI or LQDT pay a bigger dividend?
- CRI pays a dividend (2.34% yield) while LQDT does not currently pay one.
- Is CRI or LQDT more profitable?
- LQDT runs the higher net margin — CRI at 3.07% versus LQDT at 6.30%.
- Which has been the better investment, CRI or LQDT?
- Over the past 10-year, LQDT delivered the higher annualized total return — CRI at -5.79% versus LQDT at 18.06%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Carter's P/E ratioLiquidity Services P/E ratioCarter's dividend yieldLiquidity Services dividend yieldCarter's ROELiquidity Services ROECarter's operating marginLiquidity Services operating marginCarter's revenue growthLiquidity Services revenue growthCarter's free cash flowLiquidity Services free cash flow
Carter's & Liquidity Services appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 13, 2026.