Which has grown faster, CRI or GT?

Over the past five years, GT grew revenue faster — CRI at a -2.54% CAGR versus GT at 3.90%.

Does CRI or GT pay a bigger dividend?

CRI pays a dividend (3.09% yield), while GT is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.

Is CRI or GT more profitable?

CRI runs the higher net margin — CRI at 6.55% versus GT at -14.37%.

How have CRI and GT total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, CRI delivered -7.07% and GT delivered -16.92% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Carter's Inc. (CRI) vs The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (GT)

A side-by-side comparison of Carter's Inc. and The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

CRI

Carter's Inc.

$1.21B

$32.73Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 10:25 AM EDT

The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company

$1.37B

$4.77Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 10:25 AM EDT

Total return — CRI vs GT

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

CRI -51.6% (-7.0%/yr)GT -84.1% (-16.8%/yr)CRI compounded faster over this window

CRI GT

CRI vs GT: by the numbers

•GT is the larger company ($1.37B vs $1.21B market cap).
•CRI is profitable (6.55% net margin) while GT runs a net loss (-14.37%).
•GT grew revenue faster over the past five years (3.90% vs -2.54% CAGR).
•CRI pays a dividend (3.09% yield), while GT is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	CRI	GT
P/E ratio	5.96	N/A
Forward P/E	10.01	N/A
P/S ratio	0.40	0.08
P/B ratio	1.17	0.48
EV / EBITDA	5.26	6.18
FCF yield	24.29%	14.02%

Profitability

Metric	CRI	GT
Gross margin	48.60%	18.34%
Operating margin	9.24%	2.14%
Net margin	6.55%	-14.37%
ROE	18.99%	-89.57%
ROIC	10.17%	3.04%

Dividends

Metric	CRI	GT
Dividend yield	3.09%	N/A
Payout ratio	18.21%	N/A

Growth (annualized)

Metric	CRI	GT
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	-2.54%	3.90%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	-24.12%	N/A
FCF CAGR (5Y)	-26.11%	-30.63%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-16.53%	-24.58%

Frequently asked

Which has grown faster, CRI or GT?: Over the past five years, GT grew revenue faster — CRI at a -2.54% CAGR versus GT at 3.90%.
Does CRI or GT pay a bigger dividend?: CRI pays a dividend (3.09% yield), while GT is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.
Is CRI or GT more profitable?: CRI runs the higher net margin — CRI at 6.55% versus GT at -14.37%.
How have CRI and GT total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, CRI delivered -7.07% and GT delivered -16.92% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full CRI analysis Full GT analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Carter's P/E ratio Carter's dividend yield Carter's ROE Goodyear Tire & Rubber ROE Carter's operating margin Goodyear Tire & Rubber operating margin Carter's revenue growth Goodyear Tire & Rubber revenue growth Carter's free cash flow Goodyear Tire & Rubber free cash flow

Carter's & Goodyear Tire & Rubber appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Lowest P/E Ratio Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.