CRH plc (CRH) vs Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
CRH leads on 9 of 17 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of CRH plc and Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 27, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
CRH
CRH plc
$112.32Basic Materials
WPM
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp.
$113.32Basic Materials
Total return — CRH vs WPM
growth of $100 · last 21yCRH +330.3%WPM +3532.1%WPM compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
CRH WPM
CRH vs WPM: by the numbers
- •CRH is the larger company ($75.05B vs $51.46B market cap).
- •CRH trades at the lower earnings multiple (19.37 vs 28.62 P/E).
- •WPM converts more revenue to profit (65.55% vs 9.04% net margin).
- •WPM grew revenue faster over the past five years (18.70% vs 2.42% CAGR).
- •CRH pays the higher dividend yield (1.39% vs 0.69%).
Which is better, CRH or WPM?
Metric tally: CRH 9 · WPM 8It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueCRH(lower P/E)
GrowthWPM(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeCRH(higher dividend yield)
QualityWPM(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | CRH | WPM |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 19.37● | 28.62 |
| Forward P/E | 16.78● | 19.96 |
| P/S ratio | 1.34● | 18.77 |
| P/B ratio | 3.25● | 5.56 |
| PEG ratio | 2.37 | 0.20● |
| EV / EBITDA | 8.48● | 21.68 |
| FCF yield | 3.83%● | 1.92% |
Profitability
| Metric | CRH | WPM |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 35.58% | 77.10%● |
| Operating margin | 13.18% | 71.81%● |
| Net margin | 9.04% | 65.55%● |
| ROE | 21.90%● | 19.41% |
| ROIC | 8.16% | 15.60%● |
Dividends
| Metric | CRH | WPM |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 1.39%● | 0.69% |
| Payout ratio | 28.16% | 23.64% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CRH | WPM |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 2.42% | 18.70%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 31.11%● | 22.63% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | -9.91% | 8.38%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 19.74% | 22.18%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, CRH or WPM?
- It depends on your goal. value: CRH (lower P/E); growth: WPM (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: CRH (higher dividend yield); quality: WPM (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, CRH leads 9 to 8.
- Is CRH or WPM cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, CRH is cheaper: CRH trades at a 19.37 P/E and WPM at 28.62.
- Which has grown faster, CRH or WPM?
- Over the past five years, WPM grew revenue faster — CRH at a 2.42% CAGR versus WPM at 18.70%.
- Does CRH or WPM pay a bigger dividend?
- CRH yields 1.39% and WPM yields 0.69% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is CRH or WPM more profitable?
- WPM runs the higher net margin — CRH at 9.04% versus WPM at 65.55%.
- Which has been the better investment, CRH or WPM?
- Over the past 10-year, WPM delivered the higher annualized total return — CRH at 17.72% versus WPM at 19.72%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
CRH P/E ratioWheaton Precious Metals P/E ratioCRH dividend yieldWheaton Precious Metals dividend yieldCRH ROEWheaton Precious Metals ROECRH operating marginWheaton Precious Metals operating marginCRH revenue growthWheaton Precious Metals revenue growthCRH free cash flowWheaton Precious Metals free cash flow
CRH & Wheaton Precious Metals appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 27, 2026.