Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd (CRDO) vs Enerpac Tool Group Corp. (EPAC)
A side-by-side comparison of Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd and Enerpac Tool Group Corp. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 28, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
Different business models: CRDO is classified in Technology; EPAC is classified in Industrials. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.
CRDO
Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd
$192.28TechnologyDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
EPAC
Enerpac Tool Group Corp.
$37.09IndustrialsDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — CRDO vs EPAC
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 4yCRDO +1686.6%EPAC +84.1%CRDO compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
CRDO EPAC
CRDO vs EPAC: by the numbers
- •CRDO is the larger company ($35.86B vs $1.91B market cap).
- •EPAC trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (19.71 vs 83.93 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •CRDO converts more revenue to profit (35.37% vs 14.72% net margin).
- •CRDO grew revenue faster over the past five years (86.69% vs 5.10% CAGR).
- •EPAC pays a dividend (0.11% yield), while CRDO has no payments in the available dividend history.
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | CRDO | EPAC |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 83.93 | 19.71 |
| Forward P/E | 62.97 | 18.70 |
| P/S ratio | 30.04 | 2.84 |
| P/B ratio | 19.43 | 4.24 |
| PEG ratio | 0.09 | 2.78 |
| EV / EBITDA | 81.17 | 11.97 |
| FCF yield | 1.01% | 6.24% |
Profitability
| Metric | CRDO | EPAC |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 68.04% | 49.05% |
| Operating margin | 33.33% | 21.76% |
| Net margin | 35.37% | 14.72% |
| ROE | 22.89% | 22.01% |
| ROIC | 21.02% | 15.12% |
Dividends
| Metric | CRDO | EPAC |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | N/A | 0.11% |
| Payout ratio | N/A | 2.33% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CRDO | EPAC |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 86.69% | 5.10% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 129.03% | 169.53% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | N/A | 34.85% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | N/A | 6.62% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, CRDO or EPAC?
- EPAC has the lower trailing P/E: CRDO trades at 83.93 and EPAC at 19.71. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, CRDO or EPAC?
- Over the past five years, CRDO grew revenue faster — CRDO at a 86.69% CAGR versus EPAC at 5.10%.
- Does CRDO or EPAC pay a bigger dividend?
- EPAC pays a dividend (0.11% yield), while CRDO has no payments in the available dividend history.
- Is CRDO or EPAC more profitable?
- CRDO runs the higher net margin — CRDO at 35.37% versus EPAC at 14.72%.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Credo Technology Group P/E ratioEnerpac Tool P/E ratioCredo Technology Group dividend yieldEnerpac Tool dividend yieldCredo Technology Group ROEEnerpac Tool ROECredo Technology Group operating marginEnerpac Tool operating marginCredo Technology Group revenue growthEnerpac Tool revenue growthCredo Technology Group free cash flowEnerpac Tool free cash flow
Credo Technology Group & Enerpac Tool appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 28, 2026.