California Resources Corporation (CRC) vs Weatherford International plc (WFRD)
CRC leads on 9 of 15 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of California Resources Corporation and Weatherford International plc across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 15, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
CRC
California Resources Corporation
$58.61Energy
WFRD
Weatherford International plc
$101.31Energy
Total return — CRC vs WFRD
growth of $100 · last 6yCRC +524.8%WFRD +313.5%CRC compounded faster
CRC WFRD
CRC vs WFRD: by the numbers
- •WFRD is the larger company ($7.29B vs $5.20B market cap).
- •WFRD is profitable (9.49% net margin) while CRC runs a net loss (-13.09%).
- •CRC grew revenue faster over the past five years (15.91% vs 8.11% CAGR).
- •CRC pays the higher dividend yield (2.73% vs 1.04%).
Which is better, CRC or WFRD?
Metric tally: CRC 9 · WFRD 6It depends on what you're optimizing for:
GrowthCRC(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeCRC(higher dividend yield)
QualityWFRD(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | CRC | WFRD |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | — | 15.85 |
| Forward P/E | 13.17● | 17.16 |
| P/S ratio | 1.47● | 1.50 |
| P/B ratio | 1.78● | 4.16 |
| EV / EBITDA | 20.88 | 8.12● |
| FCF yield | 7.50%● | 6.37% |
Profitability
| Metric | CRC | WFRD |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 37.83% | 45.89%● |
| Operating margin | 20.70%● | 15.11% |
| Net margin | -13.09% | 9.49%● |
| ROE | -15.87% | 26.34%● |
| ROIC | 9.67% | 16.68%● |
Dividends
| Metric | CRC | WFRD |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 2.73%● | 1.04% |
| Payout ratio | 38.43% | 17.62% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CRC | WFRD |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 15.91%● | 8.11% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -28.68%● | -30.28% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 43.34%● | 30.53% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 14.72% | 45.91%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, CRC or WFRD?
- It depends on your goal. growth: CRC (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: CRC (higher dividend yield); quality: WFRD (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, CRC leads 9 to 6.
- Which has grown faster, CRC or WFRD?
- Over the past five years, CRC grew revenue faster — CRC at a 15.91% CAGR versus WFRD at 8.11%.
- Does CRC or WFRD pay a bigger dividend?
- CRC yields 2.73% and WFRD yields 1.04% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is CRC or WFRD more profitable?
- WFRD runs the higher net margin — CRC at -13.09% versus WFRD at 9.49%.
- Which has been the better investment, CRC or WFRD?
- Over the past 5-year, WFRD delivered the higher annualized total return — CRC at 16.69% versus WFRD at 45.91%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
California Resources P/E ratioWeatherford International P/E ratioCalifornia Resources dividend yieldWeatherford International dividend yieldCalifornia Resources ROEWeatherford International ROECalifornia Resources operating marginWeatherford International operating marginCalifornia Resources revenue growthWeatherford International revenue growthCalifornia Resources free cash flowWeatherford International free cash flow
California Resources & Weatherford International appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 15, 2026.