Which has grown faster, CRC or HP?

Over the past five years, HP grew revenue faster — CRC at a 15.91% CAGR versus HP at 30.24%.

Does CRC or HP pay a bigger dividend?

CRC yields 2.73% and HP yields 2.55% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Which has been the better investment, CRC or HP?

Over the past 10-year, CRC delivered the higher annualized total return — CRC at 16.69% versus HP at -0.26%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

California Resources Corporation (CRC) vs Helmerich & Payne, Inc. (HP)

CRC leads on 8 of 15 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of California Resources Corporation and Helmerich & Payne, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 15, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

CRC

California Resources Corporation

$5.20B

$58.61Energy

Helmerich & Payne, Inc.

$3.92B

$39.25Energy

Total return — CRC vs HP

growth of $100 · last 12y

CRC -27.6%HP -54.1%CRC compounded faster

CRC HP

CRC vs HP: by the numbers

•CRC is the larger company ($5.20B vs $3.92B market cap).
•Both run net losses; HP's is the smaller (-9.39% vs -13.09% net margin).
•HP grew revenue faster over the past five years (30.24% vs 15.91% CAGR).
•CRC pays the higher dividend yield (2.73% vs 2.55%).

Which is better, CRC or HP?

Metric tally: CRC 8 · HP 7

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

GrowthHP(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

IncomeCRC(higher dividend yield)

QualityCRC(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	CRC	HP
Forward P/E	13.17●	24.86
P/S ratio	1.47	0.98●
P/B ratio	1.78	1.55●
EV / EBITDA	20.88	11.12●
FCF yield	7.50%●	6.53%

Profitability

Metric	CRC	HP
Gross margin	37.83%●	11.29%
Operating margin	20.70%●	-1.85%
Net margin	-13.09%	-9.39%●
ROE	-15.87%	-14.86%●
ROIC	9.67%●	3.92%

Dividends

Metric	CRC	HP
Dividend yield	2.73%●	2.55%
Payout ratio	38.43%	—

Growth (annualized)

Metric	CRC	HP
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	15.91%	30.24%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	-28.68%	-4.17%●
FCF CAGR (5Y)	43.34%●	-2.32%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	14.72%●	7.73%

Frequently asked

Which is better, CRC or HP?: It depends on your goal. growth: HP (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: CRC (higher dividend yield); quality: CRC (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, CRC leads 8 to 7.
Which has grown faster, CRC or HP?: Over the past five years, HP grew revenue faster — CRC at a 15.91% CAGR versus HP at 30.24%.
Does CRC or HP pay a bigger dividend?: CRC yields 2.73% and HP yields 2.55% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Which has been the better investment, CRC or HP?: Over the past 10-year, CRC delivered the higher annualized total return — CRC at 16.69% versus HP at -0.26%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full CRC analysis Full HP analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

California Resources P/E ratio Helmerich & Payne P/E ratio California Resources dividend yield Helmerich & Payne dividend yield California Resources ROE Helmerich & Payne ROE California Resources operating margin Helmerich & Payne operating margin California Resources revenue growth Helmerich & Payne revenue growth California Resources free cash flow Helmerich & Payne free cash flow

California Resources & Helmerich & Payne appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Best 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 15, 2026.