Camden Property Trust (CPT) vs Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc. (GLPI)
A side-by-side comparison of Camden Property Trust and Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
Total return — CPT vs GLPI
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10yCPT vs GLPI: by the numbers
- •GLPI is the larger company ($10.84B vs $9.94B market cap).
- •GLPI converts more revenue to profit (58.53% vs 20.74% net margin).
- •CPT grew revenue faster over the past five years (7.98% vs 6.17% CAGR).
- •GLPI pays the higher dividend yield (8.44% vs 4.33%).
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | CPT | GLPI |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 32.84 | 11.13 |
| Forward P/E | 86.72 | 11.86 |
| PEG ratio | 1.41 | 2.21 |
| P/S ratio | 6.32 | 6.55 |
| P/B ratio | 2.61 | 2.18 |
| EV / EBITDA | 16.43 | 11.47 |
| FCF yield | N/A | 5.79% |
For REITs like Camden Property Trust, GAAP P/E is distorted: heavy non-cash property depreciation depresses reported earnings and overstates the multiple. Real-estate companies are valued on funds from operations (FFO / AFFO) and price-to-FFO — see the Funds From Operations section. The P/E is shown for reference only.
For REITs like Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc., GAAP P/E is distorted: heavy non-cash property depreciation depresses reported earnings and overstates the multiple. Real-estate companies are valued on funds from operations (FFO / AFFO) and price-to-FFO — see the Funds From Operations section. The P/E is shown for reference only.
Profitability
| Metric | CPT | GLPI |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 61.41% | 62.11% |
| Operating margin | 17.82% | 82.61% |
| Net margin | 20.74% | 58.53% |
| ROE | 8.58% | 19.44% |
| ROIC | 2.93% | 9.87% |
Dividends
| Metric | CPT | GLPI |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 4.33% | 8.44% |
| Payout ratio | 140.20% | 93.02% |
Camden Property Trust's payout ratio is measured against GAAP earnings, which non-cash depreciation depresses for REITs — the dividend is conventionally assessed against funds from operations (FFO / AFFO) instead, so the GAAP figure overstates the payout burden.
Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc.'s payout ratio is measured against GAAP earnings, which non-cash depreciation depresses for REITs — the dividend is conventionally assessed against funds from operations (FFO / AFFO) instead, so the GAAP figure overstates the payout burden.
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CPT | GLPI |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 7.98% | 6.17% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 23.35% | 5.01% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | N/A | 1.04% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -5.13% | 1.90% |
Frequently asked
- Which has grown faster, CPT or GLPI?
- Over the past five years, CPT grew revenue faster — CPT at a 7.98% CAGR versus GLPI at 6.17%.
- Does CPT or GLPI pay a bigger dividend?
- CPT yields 4.33% and GLPI yields 8.44% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is CPT or GLPI more profitable?
- GLPI runs the higher net margin — CPT at 20.74% versus GLPI at 58.53%.
- How have CPT and GLPI total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, CPT delivered 5.70% and GLPI delivered 8.35% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Camden Property & Gaming and Leisure Properties appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.