Which has the lower trailing P/E, CPRT or NVT?

CPRT has the lower trailing P/E: CPRT trades at 18.23 and NVT at 43.53. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, CPRT or NVT?

Over the past five years, NVT grew revenue faster — CPRT at a 11.63% CAGR versus NVT at 17.26%.

Does CPRT or NVT pay a bigger dividend?

NVT pays a dividend (0.51% yield), while CPRT has no payments in the available dividend history.

Is CPRT or NVT more profitable?

CPRT runs the higher net margin — CPRT at 31.81% versus NVT at 12.34%.

How have CPRT and NVT total returns compared?

Over the past 5 years, CPRT delivered -3.51% and NVT delivered 39.37% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Copart, Inc. (CPRT) vs nVent Electric plc (NVT)

A side-by-side comparison of Copart, Inc. and nVent Electric plc across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 13, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

CPRT

Copart, Inc.

$26.16B

$28.26IndustrialsDelayed quote: Sep 24, 2026, 10:20 AM EDT

NVT

nVent Electric plc

$25.70B

$158.89IndustrialsDelayed quote: Sep 24, 2026, 10:20 AM EDT

Total return — CPRT vs NVT

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 8y

CPRT +137.5% (+11.4%/yr)NVT +650.5% (+28.7%/yr)NVT compounded faster over this window

CPRT NVT

CPRT vs NVT: by the numbers

•CPRT is the larger company ($26.16B vs $25.70B market cap).
•CPRT trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (18.23 vs 43.53 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•CPRT converts more revenue to profit (31.81% vs 12.34% net margin).
•NVT grew revenue faster over the past five years (17.26% vs 11.63% CAGR).
•NVT pays a dividend (0.51% yield), while CPRT has no payments in the available dividend history.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	CPRT	NVT
P/E ratio	18.23	43.53
Forward P/E	17.23	30.93
P/S ratio	5.61	5.32
P/B ratio	2.88	6.45
EV / EBITDA	13.03	25.43
FCF yield	4.84%	2.25%

Profitability

Metric	CPRT	NVT
Gross margin	44.66%	36.97%
Operating margin	35.42%	17.22%
Net margin	31.81%	12.34%
ROE	16.32%	14.96%
ROIC	14.28%	10.66%

Dividends

Metric	CPRT	NVT
Dividend yield	N/A	0.51%
Payout ratio	N/A	22.74%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	CPRT	NVT
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	11.63%	17.26%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	9.52%	22.34%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	19.14%	10.16%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-3.51%	39.37%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, CPRT or NVT?: CPRT has the lower trailing P/E: CPRT trades at 18.23 and NVT at 43.53. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, CPRT or NVT?: Over the past five years, NVT grew revenue faster — CPRT at a 11.63% CAGR versus NVT at 17.26%.
Does CPRT or NVT pay a bigger dividend?: NVT pays a dividend (0.51% yield), while CPRT has no payments in the available dividend history.
Is CPRT or NVT more profitable?: CPRT runs the higher net margin — CPRT at 31.81% versus NVT at 12.34%.
How have CPRT and NVT total returns compared?: Over the past 5 years, CPRT delivered -3.51% and NVT delivered 39.37% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full CPRT analysis Full NVT analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Copart P/E ratio nVent Electric P/E ratio nVent Electric dividend yield Copart ROE nVent Electric ROE Copart operating margin nVent Electric operating margin Copart revenue growth nVent Electric revenue growth Copart free cash flow nVent Electric free cash flow

Copart & nVent Electric appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest Operating Margin Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 13, 2026.