Which has the lower trailing P/E, CPHC or RGS?

RGS has the lower trailing P/E: CPHC trades at 706.95 and RGS at 12.29. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, CPHC or RGS?

Over the past five years, CPHC grew revenue faster — CPHC at a 6.30% CAGR versus RGS at -11.57%.

Does CPHC or RGS pay a bigger dividend?

CPHC pays a dividend (1.79% yield), while RGS is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.

Is CPHC or RGS more profitable?

RGS runs the higher net margin — CPHC at 0.20% versus RGS at 3.09%.

How have CPHC and RGS total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, CPHC delivered 5.36% and RGS delivered -19.43% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Canterbury Park Holding Corporation (CPHC) vs Regis Corporation (RGS)

A side-by-side comparison of Canterbury Park Holding Corporation and Regis Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

CPHC

Canterbury Park Holding Corporation

$81M

$15.77Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 3:59 PM EDT

RGS

Regis Corporation

$74M

$29.61Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 3:59 PM EDT

Total return — CPHC vs RGS

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

CPHC +69.8% (+5.4%/yr)RGS -88.5% (-19.4%/yr)CPHC compounded faster over this window

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

CPHC RGS

CPHC vs RGS: by the numbers

•CPHC is the larger company ($81M vs $74M market cap).
•RGS trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (12.29 vs 706.95 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•RGS converts more revenue to profit (3.09% vs 0.20% net margin).
•CPHC grew revenue faster over the past five years (6.30% vs -11.57% CAGR).
•CPHC pays a dividend (1.79% yield), while RGS is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	CPHC	RGS
P/E ratio	706.95	12.29
Forward P/E	N/A	9.43
P/S ratio	1.34	0.33
P/B ratio	0.97	0.38
EV / EBITDA	9.76	12.23
FCF yield	5.98%	15.04%

Profitability

Metric	CPHC	RGS
Gross margin	28.67%	37.47%
Operating margin	4.54%	10.89%
Net margin	0.20%	3.09%
ROE	0.14%	3.58%
ROIC	1.46%	5.33%

Dividends

Metric	CPHC	RGS
Dividend yield	1.79%	N/A
Payout ratio	1255.61%	N/A

Growth (annualized)

Metric	CPHC	RGS
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	6.30%	-11.57%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	0.98%	-13.82%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, CPHC or RGS?: RGS has the lower trailing P/E: CPHC trades at 706.95 and RGS at 12.29. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, CPHC or RGS?: Over the past five years, CPHC grew revenue faster — CPHC at a 6.30% CAGR versus RGS at -11.57%.
Does CPHC or RGS pay a bigger dividend?: CPHC pays a dividend (1.79% yield), while RGS is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.
Is CPHC or RGS more profitable?: RGS runs the higher net margin — CPHC at 0.20% versus RGS at 3.09%.
How have CPHC and RGS total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, CPHC delivered 5.36% and RGS delivered -19.43% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full CPHC analysis Full RGS analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Canterbury Park P/E ratio Regis P/E ratio Canterbury Park dividend yield Canterbury Park ROE Regis ROE Canterbury Park operating margin Regis operating margin Canterbury Park revenue growth Regis revenue growth Canterbury Park free cash flow Regis free cash flow

Canterbury Park & Regis appear in these rankings

Highest FCF Yield Stocks Lowest P/E Ratio Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.