Which has the lower trailing P/E, CPHC or KEQU?

KEQU has the lower trailing P/E: CPHC trades at 706.28 and KEQU at 12.44. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, CPHC or KEQU?

Over the past five years, KEQU grew revenue faster — CPHC at a 6.30% CAGR versus KEQU at 12.99%.

Does CPHC or KEQU pay a bigger dividend?

CPHC pays a dividend (1.79% yield), while KEQU is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.

Is CPHC or KEQU more profitable?

KEQU runs the higher net margin — CPHC at 0.20% versus KEQU at 2.97%.

How have CPHC and KEQU total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, CPHC delivered 5.36% and KEQU delivered 4.80% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Canterbury Park Holding Corporation (CPHC) vs Kewaunee Scientific Corporation (KEQU)

A side-by-side comparison of Canterbury Park Holding Corporation and Kewaunee Scientific Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

CPHC

Canterbury Park Holding Corporation

$81M

$15.75Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 10:34 AM EDT

KEQU

Kewaunee Scientific Corporation

$98M

$34.33Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 10:37 AM EDT

Total return — CPHC vs KEQU

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

CPHC +69.8% (+5.4%/yr)KEQU +63.0% (+5.0%/yr)CPHC compounded faster over this window

CPHC KEQU

CPHC vs KEQU: by the numbers

•KEQU is the larger company ($98M vs $81M market cap).
•KEQU trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (12.44 vs 706.28 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•KEQU converts more revenue to profit (2.97% vs 0.20% net margin).
•KEQU grew revenue faster over the past five years (12.99% vs 6.30% CAGR).
•CPHC pays a dividend (1.79% yield), while KEQU is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	CPHC	KEQU
P/E ratio	706.28	12.44
Forward P/E	N/A	15.89
P/S ratio	1.34	0.36
P/B ratio	0.97	1.31
EV / EBITDA	9.75	6.81
FCF yield	5.98%	11.05%

Profitability

Metric	CPHC	KEQU
Gross margin	28.67%	28.55%
Operating margin	4.54%	5.43%
Net margin	0.20%	2.97%
ROE	0.14%	10.97%
ROIC	1.46%	8.25%

Dividends

Metric	CPHC	KEQU
Dividend yield	1.79%	N/A
Payout ratio	1255.61%	N/A

Growth (annualized)

Metric	CPHC	KEQU
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	6.30%	12.99%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	N/A	89.54%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	0.98%	20.76%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, CPHC or KEQU?: KEQU has the lower trailing P/E: CPHC trades at 706.28 and KEQU at 12.44. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, CPHC or KEQU?: Over the past five years, KEQU grew revenue faster — CPHC at a 6.30% CAGR versus KEQU at 12.99%.
Does CPHC or KEQU pay a bigger dividend?: CPHC pays a dividend (1.79% yield), while KEQU is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.
Is CPHC or KEQU more profitable?: KEQU runs the higher net margin — CPHC at 0.20% versus KEQU at 2.97%.
How have CPHC and KEQU total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, CPHC delivered 5.36% and KEQU delivered 4.80% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full CPHC analysis Full KEQU analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Canterbury Park P/E ratio Kewaunee Scientific P/E ratio Canterbury Park dividend yield Canterbury Park ROE Kewaunee Scientific ROE Canterbury Park operating margin Kewaunee Scientific operating margin Canterbury Park revenue growth Kewaunee Scientific revenue growth Canterbury Park free cash flow Kewaunee Scientific free cash flow

Canterbury Park & Kewaunee Scientific appear in these rankings

Highest FCF Yield Stocks Lowest P/E Ratio Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.