Canterbury Park Holding Corporation (CPHC) vs FST Corp. (KBSX)
A side-by-side comparison of Canterbury Park Holding Corporation and FST Corp. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
CPHC
Canterbury Park Holding Corporation
$16.00Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 9:43 AM EDT
KBSX
FST Corp.
$1.72Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 10:05 AM EDT
Total return — CPHC vs KBSX
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 2yCPHC -24.6% (-13.2%/yr)KBSX -85.5% (-62.0%/yr)CPHC compounded faster over this window
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
CPHC KBSX
CPHC vs KBSX: by the numbers
- •CPHC is the larger company ($82M vs $77M market cap).
- •KBSX trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (15.19 vs 717.48 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •KBSX converts more revenue to profit (9.71% vs 0.20% net margin).
- •KBSX grew revenue faster over the past five years (7.92% vs 6.30% CAGR).
- •CPHC pays a dividend (1.79% yield), while KBSX has no payments in the available dividend history.
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | CPHC | KBSX |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 717.48 | 15.19 |
| Forward P/E | N/A | 31.27 |
| P/S ratio | 1.36 | 1.45 |
| P/B ratio | 0.98 | 4.87 |
| EV / EBITDA | 9.93 | 28.05 |
| FCF yield | 5.89% | N/A |
Profitability
| Metric | CPHC | KBSX |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 28.67% | 45.28% |
| Operating margin | 4.54% | 3.08% |
| Net margin | 0.20% | 9.71% |
| ROE | 0.14% | 32.52% |
| ROIC | 1.46% | 3.14% |
Dividends
| Metric | CPHC | KBSX |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 1.79% | N/A |
| Payout ratio | 1255.61% | N/A |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CPHC | KBSX |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 6.30% | 7.92% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 0.98% | N/A |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, CPHC or KBSX?
- KBSX has the lower trailing P/E: CPHC trades at 717.48 and KBSX at 15.19. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, CPHC or KBSX?
- Over the past five years, KBSX grew revenue faster — CPHC at a 6.30% CAGR versus KBSX at 7.92%.
- Does CPHC or KBSX pay a bigger dividend?
- CPHC pays a dividend (1.79% yield), while KBSX has no payments in the available dividend history.
- Is CPHC or KBSX more profitable?
- KBSX runs the higher net margin — CPHC at 0.20% versus KBSX at 9.71%.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Canterbury Park P/E ratioFST P/E ratioCanterbury Park dividend yieldCanterbury Park ROEFST ROECanterbury Park operating marginFST operating marginCanterbury Park revenue growthFST revenue growthCanterbury Park free cash flowFST free cash flow
Canterbury Park & FST appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.