Which has the lower trailing P/E, CP or PWR?

CP has the lower trailing P/E: CP trades at 28.26 and PWR at 73.23. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, CP or PWR?

Over the past five years, PWR grew revenue faster — CP at a 20.89% CAGR versus PWR at 23.02%.

Does CP or PWR pay a bigger dividend?

CP yields 0.72% and PWR yields 0.07% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is CP or PWR more profitable?

CP runs the higher net margin — CP at 18.86% versus PWR at 4.08%.

How have CP and PWR total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, CP delivered 13.03% and PWR delivered 38.03% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Canadian Pacific Kansas City Ltd. (CP) vs Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR)

A side-by-side comparison of Canadian Pacific Kansas City Ltd. and Quanta Services, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of August 25, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Canadian Pacific Kansas City Ltd.

$83.23B

$94.68IndustrialsAt close: Aug 24, 2026, 4:00 PM ET

PWR

Quanta Services, Inc.

$92.73B

$616.78IndustrialsDelayed quote: Aug 24, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — CP vs PWR

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

CP +238.5% (+13.0%/yr)PWR +2386.7% (+37.9%/yr)PWR compounded faster over this window

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

CP PWR

CP vs PWR: by the numbers

•PWR is the larger company ($92.73B vs $83.23B market cap).
•CP trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (28.26 vs 73.23 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•CP converts more revenue to profit (18.86% vs 4.08% net margin).
•PWR grew revenue faster over the past five years (23.02% vs 20.89% CAGR).
•CP pays the higher dividend yield (0.72% vs 0.07%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	CP	PWR
P/E ratio	28.26	73.23
Forward P/E	17.72	38.22
P/S ratio	5.25	2.97
P/B ratio	2.56	10.11
EV / EBITDA	16.87	34.56
FCF yield	2.05%	2.45%

Profitability

Metric	CP	PWR
Gross margin	59.84%	14.42%
Operating margin	37.20%	6.20%
Net margin	18.86%	4.08%
ROE	9.18%	13.88%
ROIC	5.40%	8.49%

Dividends

Metric	CP	PWR
Dividend yield	0.72%	0.07%
Payout ratio	20.75%	6.26%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	CP	PWR
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	20.89%	23.02%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	3.04%	16.88%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	12.22%	42.82%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	6.79%	46.23%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, CP or PWR?: CP has the lower trailing P/E: CP trades at 28.26 and PWR at 73.23. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, CP or PWR?: Over the past five years, PWR grew revenue faster — CP at a 20.89% CAGR versus PWR at 23.02%.
Does CP or PWR pay a bigger dividend?: CP yields 0.72% and PWR yields 0.07% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is CP or PWR more profitable?: CP runs the higher net margin — CP at 18.86% versus PWR at 4.08%.
How have CP and PWR total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, CP delivered 13.03% and PWR delivered 38.03% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full CP analysis Full PWR analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Canadian Pacific Kansas City P/E ratio Quanta Services P/E ratio Canadian Pacific Kansas City dividend yield Quanta Services dividend yield Canadian Pacific Kansas City ROE Quanta Services ROE Canadian Pacific Kansas City operating margin Quanta Services operating margin Canadian Pacific Kansas City revenue growth Quanta Services revenue growth Canadian Pacific Kansas City free cash flow Quanta Services free cash flow

Canadian Pacific Kansas City & Quanta Services appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest Operating Margin Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified August 25, 2026.