Canadian Pacific Kansas City Ltd. (CP) vs Emerson Electric Co. (EMR)
CP leads on 9 of 17 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Canadian Pacific Kansas City Ltd. and Emerson Electric Co. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 26, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
CP
Canadian Pacific Kansas City Ltd.
$87.04Industrials
EMR
Emerson Electric Co.
$145.34Industrials
Total return — CP vs EMR
growth of $100 · last 30yCP +3874.4%EMR +557.9%CP compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
CP EMR
CP vs EMR: by the numbers
- •EMR is the larger company ($81.40B vs $77.27B market cap).
- •CP trades at the lower earnings multiple (24.74 vs 33.57 P/E).
- •CP converts more revenue to profit (26.86% vs 13.35% net margin).
- •CP grew revenue faster over the past five years (15.26% vs 1.43% CAGR).
- •EMR pays the higher dividend yield (1.51% vs 0.98%).
Which is better, CP or EMR?
Metric tally: CP 9 · EMR 8It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueCP(lower P/E)
GrowthCP(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeEMR(higher dividend yield)
QualityEMR(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | CP | EMR |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 24.74● | 33.57 |
| Forward P/E | 14.70● | 20.23 |
| P/S ratio | 6.56 | 4.47● |
| P/B ratio | 2.33● | 4.03 |
| PEG ratio | 1.65● | 1.78 |
| EV / EBITDA | 14.53● | 18.31 |
| FCF yield | 1.90% | 3.81%● |
Profitability
| Metric | CP | EMR |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 46.67% | 52.66%● |
| Operating margin | 36.78%● | 19.96% |
| Net margin | 26.86%● | 13.35% |
| ROE | 9.56% | 12.04%● |
| ROIC | 5.09% | 7.26%● |
Dividends
| Metric | CP | EMR |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.98% | 1.51%● |
| Payout ratio | 25.83% | 53.87% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CP | EMR |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 15.26%● | 1.43% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 3.04% | 4.54%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 8.84%● | -0.23% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 3.19% | 10.86%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, CP or EMR?
- It depends on your goal. value: CP (lower P/E); growth: CP (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: EMR (higher dividend yield); quality: EMR (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, CP leads 9 to 8.
- Is CP or EMR cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, CP is cheaper: CP trades at a 24.74 P/E and EMR at 33.57.
- Which has grown faster, CP or EMR?
- Over the past five years, CP grew revenue faster — CP at a 15.26% CAGR versus EMR at 1.43%.
- Does CP or EMR pay a bigger dividend?
- CP yields 0.98% and EMR yields 1.51% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is CP or EMR more profitable?
- CP runs the higher net margin — CP at 26.86% versus EMR at 13.35%.
- Which has been the better investment, CP or EMR?
- Over the past 10-year, CP delivered the higher annualized total return — CP at 14.38% versus EMR at 13.88%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Canadian Pacific Kansas City P/E ratioEmerson Electric P/E ratioCanadian Pacific Kansas City dividend yieldEmerson Electric dividend yieldCanadian Pacific Kansas City ROEEmerson Electric ROECanadian Pacific Kansas City operating marginEmerson Electric operating marginCanadian Pacific Kansas City revenue growthEmerson Electric revenue growthCanadian Pacific Kansas City free cash flowEmerson Electric free cash flow
Canadian Pacific Kansas City & Emerson Electric appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 26, 2026.