Which has the lower trailing P/E, CP or EMR?

CP has the lower trailing P/E: CP trades at 27.35 and EMR at 34.63. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, CP or EMR?

Over the past five years, CP grew revenue faster — CP at a 20.89% CAGR versus EMR at 0.87%.

Does CP or EMR pay a bigger dividend?

CP yields 0.75% and EMR yields 1.39% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is CP or EMR more profitable?

CP runs the higher net margin — CP at 18.86% versus EMR at 13.83%.

How have CP and EMR total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, CP delivered 13.26% and EMR delivered 14.20% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Canadian Pacific Kansas City Ltd. (CP) vs Emerson Electric Co. (EMR)

A side-by-side comparison of Canadian Pacific Kansas City Ltd. and Emerson Electric Co. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of August 9, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Canadian Pacific Kansas City Ltd.

$80.54B

$91.62IndustrialsDelayed quote: Aug 7, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

EMR

Emerson Electric Co.

$88.64B

$158.26IndustrialsDelayed quote: Aug 7, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — CP vs EMR

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

CP +239.4% (+13.0%/yr)EMR +277.5% (+14.2%/yr)EMR compounded faster over this window

CP EMR

CP vs EMR: by the numbers

•EMR is the larger company ($88.64B vs $80.54B market cap).
•CP trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (27.35 vs 34.63 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•CP converts more revenue to profit (18.86% vs 13.83% net margin).
•CP grew revenue faster over the past five years (20.89% vs 0.87% CAGR).
•EMR pays the higher dividend yield (1.39% vs 0.75%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	CP	EMR
P/E ratio	27.35	34.63
Forward P/E	17.46	24.20
P/S ratio	5.08	4.76
P/B ratio	2.48	4.38
EV / EBITDA	16.42	19.97
FCF yield	2.12%	3.90%

Profitability

Metric	CP	EMR
Gross margin	59.84%	53.16%
Operating margin	37.20%	20.11%
Net margin	18.86%	13.83%
ROE	9.18%	12.71%
ROIC	5.09%	7.26%

Dividends

Metric	CP	EMR
Dividend yield	0.75%	1.39%
Payout ratio	20.75%	53.87%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	CP	EMR
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	20.89%	0.87%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	3.04%	4.54%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	12.22%	0.41%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	5.33%	11.52%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, CP or EMR?: CP has the lower trailing P/E: CP trades at 27.35 and EMR at 34.63. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, CP or EMR?: Over the past five years, CP grew revenue faster — CP at a 20.89% CAGR versus EMR at 0.87%.
Does CP or EMR pay a bigger dividend?: CP yields 0.75% and EMR yields 1.39% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is CP or EMR more profitable?: CP runs the higher net margin — CP at 18.86% versus EMR at 13.83%.
How have CP and EMR total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, CP delivered 13.26% and EMR delivered 14.20% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full CP analysis Full EMR analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Canadian Pacific Kansas City P/E ratio Emerson Electric P/E ratio Canadian Pacific Kansas City dividend yield Emerson Electric dividend yield Canadian Pacific Kansas City ROE Emerson Electric ROE Canadian Pacific Kansas City operating margin Emerson Electric operating margin Canadian Pacific Kansas City revenue growth Emerson Electric revenue growth Canadian Pacific Kansas City free cash flow Emerson Electric free cash flow

Canadian Pacific Kansas City & Emerson Electric appear in these rankings

25+ Year Dividend Growers Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest Operating Margin Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified August 9, 2026.