Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) vs Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM)

A side-by-side comparison of Costco Wholesale Corporation and Exxon Mobil Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 28, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Compare
Different business models: COST is classified in Consumer Defensive; XOM is classified in Energy. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.

Total returnCOST vs XOM

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 30y
COST +11175.1%XOM +1731.6%COST compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
101001k10k100kStart $100200120062011201620212026$11,275$1,832
COST XOM

COST vs XOM: by the numbers

  • XOM is the larger company ($635.01B vs $428.66B market cap).
  • XOM trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (26.10 vs 47.87 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
  • XOM converts more revenue to profit (7.76% vs 3.01% net margin).
  • XOM grew revenue faster over the past five years (12.49% vs 9.48% CAGR).
  • XOM pays the higher dividend yield (2.64% vs 0.56%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

MetricCOSTXOM
P/E ratio47.8726.10
Forward P/E46.3313.93
P/S ratio1.441.99
P/B ratio12.622.55
PEG ratio5.232.16
EV / EBITDA29.8912.17
FCF yield2.08%2.90%

Profitability

MetricCOSTXOM
Gross margin12.88%25.49%
Operating margin3.82%9.01%
Net margin3.01%7.76%
ROE26.38%9.95%
ROIC19.44%6.34%

Dividends

MetricCOSTXOM
Dividend yield0.56%2.64%
Payout ratio29.44%61.26%

Growth (annualized)

MetricCOSTXOM
Revenue CAGR (5Y)9.48%12.49%
EPS CAGR (5Y)15.04%12.08%
FCF CAGR (5Y)4.95%36.20%
Total return CAGR (5Y)18.31%26.33%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, COST or XOM?
XOM has the lower trailing P/E: COST trades at 47.87 and XOM at 26.10. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, COST or XOM?
Over the past five years, XOM grew revenue faster — COST at a 9.48% CAGR versus XOM at 12.49%.
Does COST or XOM pay a bigger dividend?
COST yields 0.56% and XOM yields 2.64% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is COST or XOM more profitable?
XOM runs the higher net margin — COST at 3.01% versus XOM at 7.76%.
How have COST and XOM total returns compared?
Over the past 10 years, COST delivered 20.06% and XOM delivered 10.15% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 28, 2026.