Which has the lower trailing P/E, COST or UI?

UI has the lower trailing P/E: COST trades at 48.62 and UI at 34.68. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, COST or UI?

Over the past five years, UI grew revenue faster — COST at a 9.48% CAGR versus UI at 12.27%.

Does COST or UI pay a bigger dividend?

COST yields 0.56% and UI yields 0.59% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is COST or UI more profitable?

UI runs the higher net margin — COST at 3.01% versus UI at 30.43%.

How have COST and UI total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, COST delivered 20.24% and UI delivered 29.42% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) vs Ubiquiti Inc. (UI)

A side-by-side comparison of Costco Wholesale Corporation and Ubiquiti Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 29, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Different business models: COST is classified in Consumer Defensive; UI is classified in Technology. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.

COST

Costco Wholesale Corporation

$428.66B

$966.58Consumer DefensiveAt close: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM ET

Ubiquiti Inc.

$32.36B

$534.72TechnologyDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — COST vs UI

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 15y

COST +1234.6%UI +3282.1%UI compounded faster

COST UI

COST vs UI: by the numbers

•COST is the larger company ($428.66B vs $32.36B market cap).
•UI trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (34.68 vs 48.62 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•UI converts more revenue to profit (30.43% vs 3.01% net margin).
•UI grew revenue faster over the past five years (12.27% vs 9.48% CAGR).
•UI pays the higher dividend yield (0.59% vs 0.56%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	COST	UI
P/E ratio	48.62	34.68
Forward P/E	47.06	35.38
P/S ratio	1.46	10.56
P/B ratio	12.82	27.19
PEG ratio	5.23	0.34
EV / EBITDA	30.37	28.78
FCF yield	2.05%	2.29%

Profitability

Metric	COST	UI
Gross margin	12.88%	46.02%
Operating margin	3.82%	35.75%
Net margin	3.01%	30.43%
ROE	26.38%	78.37%
ROIC	19.44%	72.62%

Dividends

Metric	COST	UI
Dividend yield	0.56%	0.59%
Payout ratio	29.44%	27.19%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	COST	UI
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	9.48%	12.27%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	15.04%	15.17%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	4.95%	6.21%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	18.80%	13.32%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, COST or UI?: UI has the lower trailing P/E: COST trades at 48.62 and UI at 34.68. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, COST or UI?: Over the past five years, UI grew revenue faster — COST at a 9.48% CAGR versus UI at 12.27%.
Does COST or UI pay a bigger dividend?: COST yields 0.56% and UI yields 0.59% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is COST or UI more profitable?: UI runs the higher net margin — COST at 3.01% versus UI at 30.43%.
How have COST and UI total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, COST delivered 20.24% and UI delivered 29.42% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full COST analysis Full UI analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Costco Wholesale P/E ratio Ubiquiti P/E ratio Costco Wholesale dividend yield Ubiquiti dividend yield Costco Wholesale ROE Ubiquiti ROE Costco Wholesale operating margin Ubiquiti operating margin Costco Wholesale revenue growth Ubiquiti revenue growth Costco Wholesale free cash flow Ubiquiti free cash flow

Costco Wholesale & Ubiquiti appear in these rankings

Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Highest Operating Margin Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 29, 2026.