Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) vs Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited (TSM)

A side-by-side comparison of Costco Wholesale Corporation and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 11, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Compare
Different business models: COST is classified in Consumer Defensive; TSM is classified in Technology. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.

Total returnCOST vs TSM

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y
COST +544.2% (+20.5%/yr)TSM +1624.5% (+32.9%/yr)TSM compounded faster over this window
05001k2k2kStart $10020182020202220242026$644$1,724
COST TSM

COST vs TSM: by the numbers

  • TSM is the larger company ($2.25T vs $401.25B market cap).
  • TSM trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (31.37 vs 45.51 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
  • TSM converts more revenue to profit (50.32% vs 3.01% net margin).
  • TSM grew revenue faster over the past five years (22.50% vs 9.48% CAGR).
  • TSM pays the higher dividend yield (0.82% vs 0.61%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

MetricCOSTTSM
P/E ratio45.5131.37
Forward P/E39.92N/A
P/S ratio1.3715.88
P/B ratio11.9711.14
EV / EBITDA28.3221.58
FCF yield2.19%1.68%

Profitability

MetricCOSTTSM
Gross margin12.88%64.17%
Operating margin3.82%55.97%
Net margin3.01%50.32%
ROE26.38%35.29%
ROIC19.01%27.56%

Dividends

MetricCOSTTSM
Dividend yield0.61%0.82%
Payout ratio27.87%25.31%

Growth (annualized)

MetricCOSTTSM
Revenue CAGR (5Y)9.48%22.50%
EPS CAGR (5Y)15.04%25.67%
FCF CAGR (5Y)4.95%33.46%
Total return CAGR (5Y)14.89%30.04%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, COST or TSM?
TSM has the lower trailing P/E: COST trades at 45.51 and TSM at 31.37. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, COST or TSM?
Over the past five years, TSM grew revenue faster — COST at a 9.48% CAGR versus TSM at 22.50%.
Does COST or TSM pay a bigger dividend?
COST yields 0.61% and TSM yields 0.82% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is COST or TSM more profitable?
TSM runs the higher net margin — COST at 3.01% versus TSM at 50.32%.
How have COST and TSM total returns compared?
Over the past 10 years, COST delivered 20.56% and TSM delivered 33.49% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 11, 2026.