Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) vs T-Mobile US, Inc. (TMUS)

TMUS leads on 11 of 17 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Costco Wholesale Corporation and T-Mobile US, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 13, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Total return — COST vs TMUS

growth of $100 · last 19y
COST +1682.2%TMUS +231.2%COST compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
101001k10kStart $1002011201520192023$1,782$331
COST TMUS

COST vs TMUS: by the numbers

  • COST is the larger company ($435.65B vs $204.64B market cap).
  • TMUS trades at the lower earnings multiple (20.12 vs 49.41 P/E).
  • TMUS converts more revenue to profit (11.65% vs 3.01% net margin).
  • COST grew revenue faster over the past five years (9.48% vs 3.28% CAGR).
  • TMUS pays the higher dividend yield (2.08% vs 0.55%).

Which is better, COST or TMUS?

Metric tally: COST 6 · TMUS 11

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueTMUS(lower P/E)
GrowthCOST(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeTMUS(higher dividend yield)
QualityCOST(higher ROIC)

Valuation

MetricCOSTTMUS
P/E ratio49.4120.12
Forward P/E43.4013.93
P/S ratio1.492.30
P/B ratio13.033.73
PEG ratio5.2340.42
EV / EBITDA29.4311.58
FCF yield2.02%8.73%

Profitability

MetricCOSTTMUS
Gross margin12.88%54.34%
Operating margin3.82%20.36%
Net margin3.01%11.65%
ROE26.38%18.87%
ROIC19.44%7.04%

Dividends

MetricCOSTTMUS
Dividend yield0.55%2.08%
Payout ratio29.44%40.41%

Growth (annualized)

MetricCOSTTMUS
Revenue CAGR (5Y)9.48%3.28%
EPS CAGR (5Y)15.04%29.48%
FCF CAGR (5Y)4.95%45.55%
Total return CAGR (5Y)21.56%6.34%

Frequently asked

Which is better, COST or TMUS?
It depends on your goal. value: TMUS (lower P/E); growth: COST (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: TMUS (higher dividend yield); quality: COST (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, TMUS leads 11 to 6.
Is COST or TMUS cheaper?
On trailing earnings, TMUS is cheaper: COST trades at a 49.41 P/E and TMUS at 20.12.
Which has grown faster, COST or TMUS?
Over the past five years, COST grew revenue faster — COST at a 9.48% CAGR versus TMUS at 3.28%.
Does COST or TMUS pay a bigger dividend?
COST yields 0.55% and TMUS yields 2.08% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is COST or TMUS more profitable?
TMUS runs the higher net margin — COST at 3.01% versus TMUS at 11.65%.
Which has been the better investment, COST or TMUS?
Over the past 10-year, COST delivered the higher annualized total return — COST at 21.26% versus TMUS at 16.76%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 13, 2026.