Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) vs T-Mobile US, Inc. (TMUS)

A side-by-side comparison of Costco Wholesale Corporation and T-Mobile US, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 28, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Compare
Different business models: COST is classified in Consumer Defensive; TMUS is classified in Communication Services. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.

Total returnCOST vs TMUS

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 19y
COST +2003.8%TMUS +225.0%COST compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
101001k10kStart $1002011201520192023$2,104$325
COST TMUS

COST vs TMUS: by the numbers

  • COST is the larger company ($428.66B vs $195.64B market cap).
  • TMUS trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (18.56 vs 47.87 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
  • TMUS converts more revenue to profit (11.45% vs 3.01% net margin).
  • COST grew revenue faster over the past five years (9.48% vs 3.05% CAGR).
  • TMUS pays the higher dividend yield (2.22% vs 0.56%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

MetricCOSTTMUS
P/E ratio47.8718.56
Forward P/E46.3316.30
P/S ratio1.442.08
P/B ratio12.623.41
PEG ratio5.2340.40
EV / EBITDA29.8910.01
FCF yield2.08%8.25%

Profitability

MetricCOSTTMUS
Gross margin12.88%54.46%
Operating margin3.82%20.30%
Net margin3.01%11.45%
ROE26.38%18.77%
ROIC19.44%7.04%

Dividends

MetricCOSTTMUS
Dividend yield0.56%2.22%
Payout ratio29.44%40.41%

Growth (annualized)

MetricCOSTTMUS
Revenue CAGR (5Y)9.48%3.05%
EPS CAGR (5Y)15.04%29.48%
FCF CAGR (5Y)4.95%41.38%
Total return CAGR (5Y)18.31%5.83%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, COST or TMUS?
TMUS has the lower trailing P/E: COST trades at 47.87 and TMUS at 18.56. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, COST or TMUS?
Over the past five years, COST grew revenue faster — COST at a 9.48% CAGR versus TMUS at 3.05%.
Does COST or TMUS pay a bigger dividend?
COST yields 0.56% and TMUS yields 2.22% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is COST or TMUS more profitable?
TMUS runs the higher net margin — COST at 3.01% versus TMUS at 11.45%.
How have COST and TMUS total returns compared?
Over the past 10 years, COST delivered 20.06% and TMUS delivered 15.35% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 28, 2026.