Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) vs Toyota Motor Corporation (TM)
A side-by-side comparison of Costco Wholesale Corporation and Toyota Motor Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 13, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
Different business models: COST is classified in Consumer Defensive; TM is classified in Consumer Cyclical. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.
COST
Costco Wholesale Corporation
$901.35Consumer DefensiveDelayed quote: Sep 15, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
TM
Toyota Motor Corporation
$195.47Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Sep 15, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — COST vs TM
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10yCOST +530.0% (+20.2%/yr)TM +132.8% (+8.8%/yr)COST compounded faster over this window
COST TM
COST vs TM: by the numbers
- •COST is the larger company ($399.73B vs $231.47B market cap).
- •TM trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (8.63 vs 45.34 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •TM converts more revenue to profit (8.60% vs 3.01% net margin).
- •COST grew revenue faster over the past five years (9.48% vs 3.43% CAGR).
- •TM pays the higher dividend yield (3.03% vs 0.61%).
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | COST | TM |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 45.34 | 8.63 |
| Forward P/E | 39.77 | N/A |
| P/S ratio | 1.36 | 0.69 |
| P/B ratio | 11.93 | 1.02 |
| EV / EBITDA | 28.21 | 10.99 |
| FCF yield | 2.20% | N/A |
Profitability
| Metric | COST | TM |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 12.88% | 16.74% |
| Operating margin | 3.82% | 7.05% |
| Net margin | 3.01% | 8.60% |
| ROE | 26.38% | 12.69% |
| ROIC | 19.01% | 3.53% |
Dividends
| Metric | COST | TM |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.61% | 3.03% |
| Payout ratio | 27.87% | 26.50% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | COST | TM |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 9.48% | 3.43% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 15.04% | 6.33% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 4.95% | N/A |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 14.94% | 5.25% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, COST or TM?
- TM has the lower trailing P/E: COST trades at 45.34 and TM at 8.63. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, COST or TM?
- Over the past five years, COST grew revenue faster — COST at a 9.48% CAGR versus TM at 3.43%.
- Does COST or TM pay a bigger dividend?
- COST yields 0.61% and TM yields 3.03% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is COST or TM more profitable?
- TM runs the higher net margin — COST at 3.01% versus TM at 8.60%.
- How have COST and TM total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, COST delivered 20.59% and TM delivered 8.44% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Costco Wholesale P/E ratioToyota Motor P/E ratioCostco Wholesale dividend yieldToyota Motor dividend yieldCostco Wholesale ROEToyota Motor ROECostco Wholesale operating marginToyota Motor operating marginCostco Wholesale revenue growthToyota Motor revenue growthCostco Wholesale free cash flowToyota Motor free cash flow
Costco Wholesale & Toyota Motor appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 13, 2026.