Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) vs Seagate Technology Holdings plc (STX)

A side-by-side comparison of Costco Wholesale Corporation and Seagate Technology Holdings plc across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 11, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Compare
Different business models: COST is classified in Consumer Defensive; STX is classified in Technology. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.

Total returnCOST vs STX

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y
COST +537.6% (+20.4%/yr)STX +3613.4% (+43.5%/yr)STX compounded faster over this window
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
101001k10kStart $10020182020202220242026$638$3,713
COST STX

COST vs STX: by the numbers

  • COST is the larger company ($401.25B vs $186.15B market cap).
  • COST trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (45.51 vs 59.72 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
  • STX converts more revenue to profit (26.11% vs 3.01% net margin).
  • COST grew revenue faster over the past five years (9.48% vs 2.68% CAGR).
  • COST pays the higher dividend yield (0.61% vs 0.33%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

MetricCOSTSTX
P/E ratio45.5159.72
Forward P/E39.9223.07
P/S ratio1.3715.26
P/B ratio11.9785.90
EV / EBITDA28.3243.09
FCF yield2.19%1.67%

Profitability

MetricCOSTSTX
Gross margin12.88%45.58%
Operating margin3.82%33.57%
Net margin3.01%26.11%
ROE26.38%146.93%
ROIC19.01%51.40%

Dividends

MetricCOSTSTX
Dividend yield0.61%0.33%
Payout ratio27.87%21.15%

Growth (annualized)

MetricCOSTSTX
Revenue CAGR (5Y)9.48%2.68%
EPS CAGR (5Y)15.04%21.76%
FCF CAGR (5Y)4.95%24.10%
Total return CAGR (5Y)14.89%63.76%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, COST or STX?
COST has the lower trailing P/E: COST trades at 45.51 and STX at 59.72. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, COST or STX?
Over the past five years, COST grew revenue faster — COST at a 9.48% CAGR versus STX at 2.68%.
Does COST or STX pay a bigger dividend?
COST yields 0.61% and STX yields 0.33% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is COST or STX more profitable?
STX runs the higher net margin — COST at 3.01% versus STX at 26.11%.
How have COST and STX total returns compared?
Over the past 10 years, COST delivered 20.56% and STX delivered 43.57% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 11, 2026.