Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) vs Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR)

A side-by-side comparison of Costco Wholesale Corporation and Palantir Technologies Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 28, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Compare
Different business models: COST is classified in Consumer Defensive; PLTR is classified in Technology. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.

Total returnCOST vs PLTR

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 6y
COST +183.0%PLTR +1284.5%PLTR compounded faster
05001k2k2kStart $100202120222023202420252026$283$1,385
COST PLTR

COST vs PLTR: by the numbers

  • COST is the larger company ($428.66B vs $283.63B market cap).
  • COST trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (47.87 vs 146.14 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
  • PLTR converts more revenue to profit (43.67% vs 3.01% net margin).
  • PLTR grew revenue faster over the past five years (34.11% vs 9.48% CAGR).
  • COST pays a dividend (0.56% yield), while PLTR has no payments in the available dividend history.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

MetricCOSTPLTR
P/E ratio47.87146.14
Forward P/E46.3390.26
P/S ratio1.4464.73
P/B ratio12.6240.02
PEG ratio5.231.13
EV / EBITDA29.89166.52
FCF yield2.08%0.80%

Profitability

MetricCOSTPLTR
Gross margin12.88%84.07%
Operating margin3.82%38.13%
Net margin3.01%43.67%
ROE26.38%27.00%
ROIC19.44%17.95%

Dividends

MetricCOSTPLTR
Dividend yield0.56%N/A
Payout ratio29.44%N/A

Growth (annualized)

MetricCOSTPLTR
Revenue CAGR (5Y)9.48%34.11%
EPS CAGR (5Y)15.04%N/A
FCF CAGR (5Y)4.95%94.15%
Total return CAGR (5Y)18.31%40.57%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, COST or PLTR?
COST has the lower trailing P/E: COST trades at 47.87 and PLTR at 146.14. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, COST or PLTR?
Over the past five years, PLTR grew revenue faster — COST at a 9.48% CAGR versus PLTR at 34.11%.
Does COST or PLTR pay a bigger dividend?
COST pays a dividend (0.56% yield), while PLTR has no payments in the available dividend history.
Is COST or PLTR more profitable?
PLTR runs the higher net margin — COST at 3.01% versus PLTR at 43.67%.
How have COST and PLTR total returns compared?
Over the past 5 years, COST delivered 20.06% and PLTR delivered 40.57% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 28, 2026.