Which has the lower trailing P/E, COST or NBIS?

COST has the lower trailing P/E: COST trades at 47.87 and NBIS at 62.63. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, COST or NBIS?

Over the past five years, COST grew revenue faster — COST at a 9.48% CAGR versus NBIS at -23.11%.

Does COST or NBIS pay a bigger dividend?

COST pays a dividend (0.56% yield), while NBIS has no payments in the available dividend history.

Is COST or NBIS more profitable?

NBIS runs the higher net margin — COST at 3.01% versus NBIS at 95.27%.

Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) vs Nebius Group N.V. (NBIS)

A side-by-side comparison of Costco Wholesale Corporation and Nebius Group N.V. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 28, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Different business models: COST is classified in Consumer Defensive; NBIS is classified in Technology. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.

COST

Costco Wholesale Corporation

$428.66B

$966.58Consumer DefensiveDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

NBIS

Nebius Group N.V.

$40.73B

$169.69TechnologyDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — COST vs NBIS

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 2y

COST +8.2%NBIS +839.4%NBIS compounded faster

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

COST NBIS

COST vs NBIS: by the numbers

•COST is the larger company ($428.66B vs $40.73B market cap).
•COST trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (47.87 vs 62.63 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•NBIS converts more revenue to profit (95.27% vs 3.01% net margin).
•COST grew revenue faster over the past five years (9.48% vs -23.11% CAGR).
•COST pays a dividend (0.56% yield), while NBIS has no payments in the available dividend history.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	COST	NBIS
P/E ratio	47.87	62.63
Forward P/E	46.33	N/A
P/S ratio	1.44	66.12
P/B ratio	12.62	8.02
PEG ratio	5.23	N/A
EV / EBITDA	29.89	N/A
FCF yield	2.08%	N/A

Profitability

Metric	COST	NBIS
Gross margin	12.88%	68.63%
Operating margin	3.82%	-112.53%
Net margin	3.01%	95.27%
ROE	26.38%	11.55%
ROIC	19.44%	-4.75%

Dividends

Metric	COST	NBIS
Dividend yield	0.56%	N/A
Payout ratio	29.44%	N/A

Growth (annualized)

Metric	COST	NBIS
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	9.48%	-23.11%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	15.04%	-35.43%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	4.95%	N/A
Total return CAGR (5Y)	18.31%	N/A

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, COST or NBIS?: COST has the lower trailing P/E: COST trades at 47.87 and NBIS at 62.63. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, COST or NBIS?: Over the past five years, COST grew revenue faster — COST at a 9.48% CAGR versus NBIS at -23.11%.
Does COST or NBIS pay a bigger dividend?: COST pays a dividend (0.56% yield), while NBIS has no payments in the available dividend history.
Is COST or NBIS more profitable?: NBIS runs the higher net margin — COST at 3.01% versus NBIS at 95.27%.

Go deeper

Full COST analysis Full NBIS analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Costco Wholesale P/E ratio Nebius P/E ratio Costco Wholesale dividend yield Nebius dividend yield Costco Wholesale ROE Nebius ROE Costco Wholesale operating margin Nebius operating margin Costco Wholesale revenue growth Nebius revenue growth Costco Wholesale free cash flow Nebius free cash flow

Costco Wholesale & Nebius appear in these rankings

Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks Largest Companies by Market Cap

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 28, 2026.