Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) vs Mondelez International, Inc. (MDLZ)

MDLZ leads on 9 of 16 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Costco Wholesale Corporation and Mondelez International, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 9, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Compare

Total return — COST vs MDLZ

growth of $100 · last 25y
COST +2254.0%MDLZ +190.9%COST compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
101001k10kStart $10020062011201620212026$2,354$291
COST MDLZ

COST vs MDLZ: by the numbers

  • COST is the larger company ($404.88B vs $74.84B market cap).
  • MDLZ trades at the lower earnings multiple (29.74 vs 47.94 P/E).
  • MDLZ converts more revenue to profit (6.64% vs 3.01% net margin).
  • COST grew revenue faster over the past five years (9.48% vs 7.71% CAGR).
  • MDLZ pays the higher dividend yield (3.36% vs 0.62%).

Which is better, COST or MDLZ?

Metric tally: COST 7 · MDLZ 9

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueMDLZ(lower P/E)
GrowthCOST(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeMDLZ(higher dividend yield)
QualityCOST(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

MetricCOSTMDLZ
P/E ratio47.9429.74
Forward P/E46.4119.49
P/S ratio1.441.96
P/B ratio12.642.98
PEG ratio5.23
EV / EBITDA29.9418.89
FCF yield2.08%3.35%

Profitability

MetricCOSTMDLZ
Gross margin12.88%28.77%
Operating margin3.82%9.55%
Net margin3.01%6.64%
ROE26.38%10.13%
ROIC19.44%5.13%

Dividends

MetricCOSTMDLZ
Dividend yield0.62%3.36%
Payout ratio32.24%105.82%

Growth (annualized)

MetricCOSTMDLZ
Revenue CAGR (5Y)9.48%7.71%
EPS CAGR (5Y)15.04%-5.29%
FCF CAGR (5Y)4.95%-7.14%
Total return CAGR (5Y)19.29%1.53%

Frequently asked

Which is better, COST or MDLZ?
It depends on your goal. value: MDLZ (lower P/E); growth: COST (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: MDLZ (higher dividend yield); quality: COST (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, MDLZ leads 9 to 7.
Is COST or MDLZ cheaper?
On trailing earnings, MDLZ is cheaper: COST trades at a 47.94 P/E and MDLZ at 29.74.
Which has grown faster, COST or MDLZ?
Over the past five years, COST grew revenue faster — COST at a 9.48% CAGR versus MDLZ at 7.71%.
Does COST or MDLZ pay a bigger dividend?
COST yields 0.62% and MDLZ yields 3.36% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is COST or MDLZ more profitable?
MDLZ runs the higher net margin — COST at 3.01% versus MDLZ at 6.64%.
Which has been the better investment, COST or MDLZ?
Over the past 10-year, COST delivered the higher annualized total return — COST at 20.12% versus MDLZ at 5.04%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 9, 2026.