Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) vs Mondelez International, Inc. (MDLZ)

A side-by-side comparison of Costco Wholesale Corporation and Mondelez International, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of August 23, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Compare

Total returnCOST vs MDLZ

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y
COST +511.5% (+19.9%/yr)MDLZ +89.0% (+6.6%/yr)COST compounded faster over this window
200400600Start $10020182020202220242026$611$189
COST MDLZ

COST vs MDLZ: by the numbers

  • COST is the larger company ($420.30B vs $82.26B market cap).
  • MDLZ trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (23.78 vs 47.67 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
  • MDLZ converts more revenue to profit (8.86% vs 3.01% net margin).
  • COST grew revenue faster over the past five years (9.48% vs 7.34% CAGR).
  • MDLZ pays the higher dividend yield (3.10% vs 0.58%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

MetricCOSTMDLZ
P/E ratio47.6723.78
Forward P/E46.1621.14
P/S ratio1.432.10
P/B ratio12.573.13
EV / EBITDA29.7717.51
FCF yield2.09%3.71%

Profitability

MetricCOSTMDLZ
Gross margin12.88%31.15%
Operating margin3.82%11.42%
Net margin3.01%8.86%
ROE26.38%13.20%
ROIC19.01%6.47%

Dividends

MetricCOSTMDLZ
Dividend yield0.58%3.10%
Payout ratio30.37%105.82%

Growth (annualized)

MetricCOSTMDLZ
Revenue CAGR (5Y)9.48%7.34%
EPS CAGR (5Y)15.04%-5.29%
FCF CAGR (5Y)4.95%0.85%
Total return CAGR (5Y)16.32%3.00%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, COST or MDLZ?
MDLZ has the lower trailing P/E: COST trades at 47.67 and MDLZ at 23.78. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, COST or MDLZ?
Over the past five years, COST grew revenue faster — COST at a 9.48% CAGR versus MDLZ at 7.34%.
Does COST or MDLZ pay a bigger dividend?
COST yields 0.58% and MDLZ yields 3.10% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is COST or MDLZ more profitable?
MDLZ runs the higher net margin — COST at 3.01% versus MDLZ at 8.86%.
How have COST and MDLZ total returns compared?
Over the past 10 years, COST delivered 19.84% and MDLZ delivered 6.61% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified August 23, 2026.