Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) vs Mondelez International, Inc. (MDLZ)
MDLZ leads on 9 of 16 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Costco Wholesale Corporation and Mondelez International, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 9, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
COST
Costco Wholesale Corporation
$912.97Consumer Defensive
MDLZ
Mondelez International, Inc.
$58.30Consumer Defensive
Total return — COST vs MDLZ
growth of $100 · last 25yCOST +2254.0%MDLZ +190.9%COST compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
COST MDLZ
COST vs MDLZ: by the numbers
- •COST is the larger company ($404.88B vs $74.84B market cap).
- •MDLZ trades at the lower earnings multiple (29.74 vs 47.94 P/E).
- •MDLZ converts more revenue to profit (6.64% vs 3.01% net margin).
- •COST grew revenue faster over the past five years (9.48% vs 7.71% CAGR).
- •MDLZ pays the higher dividend yield (3.36% vs 0.62%).
Which is better, COST or MDLZ?
Metric tally: COST 7 · MDLZ 9It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueMDLZ(lower P/E)
GrowthCOST(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeMDLZ(higher dividend yield)
QualityCOST(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | COST | MDLZ |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 47.94 | 29.74● |
| Forward P/E | 46.41 | 19.49● |
| P/S ratio | 1.44● | 1.96 |
| P/B ratio | 12.64 | 2.98● |
| PEG ratio | 5.23 | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 29.94 | 18.89● |
| FCF yield | 2.08% | 3.35%● |
Profitability
| Metric | COST | MDLZ |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 12.88% | 28.77%● |
| Operating margin | 3.82% | 9.55%● |
| Net margin | 3.01% | 6.64%● |
| ROE | 26.38%● | 10.13% |
| ROIC | 19.44%● | 5.13% |
Dividends
| Metric | COST | MDLZ |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.62% | 3.36%● |
| Payout ratio | 32.24% | 105.82% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | COST | MDLZ |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 9.48%● | 7.71% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 15.04%● | -5.29% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 4.95%● | -7.14% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 19.29%● | 1.53% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, COST or MDLZ?
- It depends on your goal. value: MDLZ (lower P/E); growth: COST (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: MDLZ (higher dividend yield); quality: COST (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, MDLZ leads 9 to 7.
- Is COST or MDLZ cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, MDLZ is cheaper: COST trades at a 47.94 P/E and MDLZ at 29.74.
- Which has grown faster, COST or MDLZ?
- Over the past five years, COST grew revenue faster — COST at a 9.48% CAGR versus MDLZ at 7.71%.
- Does COST or MDLZ pay a bigger dividend?
- COST yields 0.62% and MDLZ yields 3.36% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is COST or MDLZ more profitable?
- MDLZ runs the higher net margin — COST at 3.01% versus MDLZ at 6.64%.
- Which has been the better investment, COST or MDLZ?
- Over the past 10-year, COST delivered the higher annualized total return — COST at 20.12% versus MDLZ at 5.04%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Costco Wholesale P/E ratioMondelez International P/E ratioCostco Wholesale dividend yieldMondelez International dividend yieldCostco Wholesale ROEMondelez International ROECostco Wholesale operating marginMondelez International operating marginCostco Wholesale revenue growthMondelez International revenue growthCostco Wholesale free cash flowMondelez International free cash flow
Costco Wholesale & Mondelez International appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 9, 2026.