Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) vs Manhattan Associates, Inc. (MANH)
A side-by-side comparison of Costco Wholesale Corporation and Manhattan Associates, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 11, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
Different business models: COST is classified in Consumer Defensive; MANH is classified in Technology. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.
COST
Costco Wholesale Corporation
$904.77Consumer DefensiveDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
MANH
Manhattan Associates, Inc.
$201.82TechnologyDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — COST vs MANH
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10yCOST +544.2% (+20.5%/yr)MANH +249.4% (+13.3%/yr)COST compounded faster over this window
COST MANH
COST vs MANH: by the numbers
- •COST is the larger company ($401.25B vs $11.77B market cap).
- •COST trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (45.51 vs 57.83 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •MANH converts more revenue to profit (18.67% vs 3.01% net margin).
- •MANH grew revenue faster over the past five years (12.69% vs 9.48% CAGR).
- •COST pays a dividend (0.61% yield), while MANH has no payments in the available dividend history.
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | COST | MANH |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 45.51 | 57.83 |
| Forward P/E | 39.92 | 36.71 |
| P/S ratio | 1.37 | 10.45 |
| P/B ratio | 11.97 | 74.71 |
| EV / EBITDA | 28.32 | 41.45 |
| FCF yield | 2.19% | 3.39% |
Profitability
| Metric | COST | MANH |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 12.88% | 54.65% |
| Operating margin | 3.82% | 24.33% |
| Net margin | 3.01% | 18.67% |
| ROE | 26.38% | 133.48% |
| ROIC | 19.01% | 90.92% |
Dividends
| Metric | COST | MANH |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.61% | N/A |
| Payout ratio | 27.87% | N/A |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | COST | MANH |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 9.48% | 12.69% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 15.04% | 21.59% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 4.95% | 19.51% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 14.89% | 4.78% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, COST or MANH?
- COST has the lower trailing P/E: COST trades at 45.51 and MANH at 57.83. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, COST or MANH?
- Over the past five years, MANH grew revenue faster — COST at a 9.48% CAGR versus MANH at 12.69%.
- Does COST or MANH pay a bigger dividend?
- COST pays a dividend (0.61% yield), while MANH has no payments in the available dividend history.
- Is COST or MANH more profitable?
- MANH runs the higher net margin — COST at 3.01% versus MANH at 18.67%.
- How have COST and MANH total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, COST delivered 20.56% and MANH delivered 13.30% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Costco Wholesale P/E ratioManhattan Associates P/E ratioCostco Wholesale dividend yieldCostco Wholesale ROEManhattan Associates ROECostco Wholesale operating marginManhattan Associates operating marginCostco Wholesale revenue growthManhattan Associates revenue growthCostco Wholesale free cash flowManhattan Associates free cash flow
Costco Wholesale & Manhattan Associates appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 11, 2026.