Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) vs The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS)

A side-by-side comparison of Costco Wholesale Corporation and The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 28, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Compare
Different business models: COST is classified in Consumer Defensive; GS is classified in Financial Services. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.

Total returnCOST vs GS

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 27y
COST +2560.4%GS +2127.6%COST compounded faster
01k2k3kStart $10020042009201420192024$2,660$2,228
COST GS

COST vs GS: by the numbers

  • COST is the larger company ($428.66B vs $304.84B market cap).
  • GS trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (16.18 vs 47.87 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
  • GS converts more revenue to profit (17.78% vs 3.01% net margin).
  • GS grew revenue faster over the past five years (13.76% vs 9.48% CAGR).
  • GS pays the higher dividend yield (1.62% vs 0.56%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

MetricCOSTGS
P/E ratio47.8716.18
Forward P/E46.3315.11
P/S ratio1.442.71
P/B ratio12.622.60
PEG ratio5.230.65
EV / EBITDA29.89N/A
FCF yield2.08%N/A

Profitability

MetricCOSTGS
Gross margin12.88%47.48%
Operating margin3.82%24.81%
Net margin3.01%17.78%
ROE26.38%17.05%
ROIC19.44%1.92%

Dividends

MetricCOSTGS
Dividend yield0.56%1.62%
Payout ratio29.44%32.72%

Growth (annualized)

MetricCOSTGS
Revenue CAGR (5Y)9.48%13.76%
EPS CAGR (5Y)15.04%15.75%
FCF CAGR (5Y)4.95%N/A
Total return CAGR (5Y)18.31%25.27%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, COST or GS?
GS has the lower trailing P/E: COST trades at 47.87 and GS at 16.18. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, COST or GS?
Over the past five years, GS grew revenue faster — COST at a 9.48% CAGR versus GS at 13.76%.
Does COST or GS pay a bigger dividend?
COST yields 0.56% and GS yields 1.62% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is COST or GS more profitable?
GS runs the higher net margin — COST at 3.01% versus GS at 17.78%.
How have COST and GS total returns compared?
Over the past 10 years, COST delivered 20.06% and GS delivered 22.84% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 28, 2026.