Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) vs General Motors Company (GM)

A side-by-side comparison of Costco Wholesale Corporation and General Motors Company across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 11, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Compare
Different business models: COST is classified in Consumer Defensive; GM is classified in Consumer Cyclical. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.

Total returnCOST vs GM

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y
COST +528.3% (+20.2%/yr)GM +238.2% (+13.0%/yr)COST compounded faster over this window
200400600Start $10020182020202220242026$628$338
COST GM

COST vs GM: by the numbers

  • COST is the larger company ($401.25B vs $77.44B market cap).
  • GM trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (43.24 vs 45.51 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
  • COST converts more revenue to profit (3.01% vs 1.03% net margin).
  • COST grew revenue faster over the past five years (9.48% vs 5.85% CAGR).
  • GM pays the higher dividend yield (0.77% vs 0.61%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

MetricCOSTGM
P/E ratio45.5143.24
Forward P/E39.92N/A
P/S ratio1.370.42
P/B ratio11.971.25
EV / EBITDA28.3214.13
FCF yield2.19%21.31%

Profitability

MetricCOSTGM
Gross margin12.88%5.74%
Operating margin3.82%0.98%
Net margin3.01%1.03%
ROE26.38%3.10%
ROIC19.01%0.81%

Dividends

MetricCOSTGM
Dividend yield0.61%0.77%
Payout ratio27.87%33.33%

Growth (annualized)

MetricCOSTGM
Revenue CAGR (5Y)9.48%5.85%
EPS CAGR (5Y)15.04%-5.25%
FCF CAGR (5Y)4.95%N/A
Total return CAGR (5Y)14.89%12.67%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, COST or GM?
GM has the lower trailing P/E: COST trades at 45.51 and GM at 43.24. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, COST or GM?
Over the past five years, COST grew revenue faster — COST at a 9.48% CAGR versus GM at 5.85%.
Does COST or GM pay a bigger dividend?
COST yields 0.61% and GM yields 0.77% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is COST or GM more profitable?
COST runs the higher net margin — COST at 3.01% versus GM at 1.03%.
How have COST and GM total returns compared?
Over the past 10 years, COST delivered 20.56% and GM delivered 13.04% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 11, 2026.