Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) vs Ford Motor Company (F)
COST leads on 9 of 15 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Costco Wholesale Corporation and Ford Motor Company across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 14, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
COST
Costco Wholesale Corporation
$982.35Consumer Defensive
F
Ford Motor Company
$14.84Consumer Cyclical
Total return — COST vs F
growth of $100 · last 30yCOST +9597.4%F +17.4%COST compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
COST F
COST vs F: by the numbers
- •COST is the larger company ($435.65B vs $58.08B market cap).
- •COST is profitable (3.01% net margin) while F runs a net loss (-3.22%).
- •COST grew revenue faster over the past five years (9.48% vs 8.03% CAGR).
- •F pays the higher dividend yield (4.04% vs 0.55%).
Which is better, COST or F?
Metric tally: COST 9 · F 6It depends on what you're optimizing for:
GrowthCOST(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeF(higher dividend yield)
QualityCOST(higher ROIC)
Valuation
| Metric | COST | F |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 49.41 | — |
| Forward P/E | 43.40 | 8.10● |
| P/S ratio | 1.49 | 0.32● |
| P/B ratio | 13.03 | 1.61● |
| PEG ratio | 5.23 | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 29.43● | 274.95 |
| FCF yield | 2.02% | 15.80%● |
Profitability
| Metric | COST | F |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 12.88%● | 9.18% |
| Operating margin | 3.82%● | 1.84% |
| Net margin | 3.01%● | -3.22% |
| ROE | 26.38%● | -16.30% |
| ROIC | 19.44%● | 0.75% |
Dividends
| Metric | COST | F |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.55% | 4.04%● |
| Payout ratio | 29.44% | — |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | COST | F |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 9.48%● | 8.03% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 15.04% | 171.57%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 4.95%● | -16.77% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 21.56%● | 4.23% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, COST or F?
- It depends on your goal. growth: COST (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: F (higher dividend yield); quality: COST (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, COST leads 9 to 6.
- Which has grown faster, COST or F?
- Over the past five years, COST grew revenue faster — COST at a 9.48% CAGR versus F at 8.03%.
- Does COST or F pay a bigger dividend?
- COST yields 0.55% and F yields 4.04% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is COST or F more profitable?
- COST runs the higher net margin — COST at 3.01% versus F at -3.22%.
- Which has been the better investment, COST or F?
- Over the past 10-year, COST delivered the higher annualized total return — COST at 21.26% versus F at 6.07%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Costco Wholesale P/E ratioFord Motor P/E ratioCostco Wholesale dividend yieldFord Motor dividend yieldCostco Wholesale ROEFord Motor ROECostco Wholesale operating marginFord Motor operating marginCostco Wholesale revenue growthFord Motor revenue growthCostco Wholesale free cash flowFord Motor free cash flow
Costco Wholesale & Ford Motor appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 14, 2026.