Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) vs Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO)

A side-by-side comparison of Costco Wholesale Corporation and Cisco Systems, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 28, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Compare
Different business models: COST is classified in Consumer Defensive; CSCO is classified in Technology. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.

Total returnCOST vs CSCO

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 30y
COST +11175.1%CSCO +3103.2%COST compounded faster
05k10kStart $100200120062011201620212026$11,275$3,203
COST CSCO

COST vs CSCO: by the numbers

  • CSCO is the larger company ($455.55B vs $428.66B market cap).
  • CSCO trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (38.19 vs 47.87 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
  • CSCO converts more revenue to profit (19.69% vs 3.01% net margin).
  • COST grew revenue faster over the past five years (9.48% vs 4.58% CAGR).
  • CSCO pays the higher dividend yield (1.45% vs 0.56%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

MetricCOSTCSCO
P/E ratio47.8738.19
Forward P/E46.3326.80
P/S ratio1.447.52
P/B ratio12.629.35
PEG ratio5.2368.42
EV / EBITDA29.8928.77
FCF yield2.08%2.76%

Profitability

MetricCOSTCSCO
Gross margin12.88%64.33%
Operating margin3.82%23.36%
Net margin3.01%19.69%
ROE26.38%24.47%
ROIC19.44%11.66%

Dividends

MetricCOSTCSCO
Dividend yield0.56%1.45%
Payout ratio29.44%64.84%

Growth (annualized)

MetricCOSTCSCO
Revenue CAGR (5Y)9.48%4.58%
EPS CAGR (5Y)15.04%0.50%
FCF CAGR (5Y)4.95%-2.45%
Total return CAGR (5Y)18.31%19.58%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, COST or CSCO?
CSCO has the lower trailing P/E: COST trades at 47.87 and CSCO at 38.19. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, COST or CSCO?
Over the past five years, COST grew revenue faster — COST at a 9.48% CAGR versus CSCO at 4.58%.
Does COST or CSCO pay a bigger dividend?
COST yields 0.56% and CSCO yields 1.45% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is COST or CSCO more profitable?
CSCO runs the higher net margin — COST at 3.01% versus CSCO at 19.69%.
How have COST and CSCO total returns compared?
Over the past 10 years, COST delivered 20.06% and CSCO delivered 17.77% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 28, 2026.